ArticleJAMA neurology2023
Development and Validation of a Postprocedural Model to Predict Outcome After Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparing Early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Versus 90-Day Modified Rankin Scale Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Re: Discharge NIHSS scores are predictive of poor 3-month outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Full Medical Support versus Limited Medical Care in Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction after Successful Recanalization for Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Validation and simplification of the MR PREDICTS @24H model for outcome prediction after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2026Observational
- Do we still need the crystal ball to predict the outcome of acute stroke?European radiology · 2026Article
- Global vasodilatation in the middle cerebral artery territory as a new imaging marker of poor outcome after endovascular thrombectomy.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Machine Learning to Predict Upper-Limb Outcome Within the First 72 Hours Poststroke.Stroke · 2026Article
- ESR Innovation in Focus: AI in interventional radiology: existing applications and ongoing research.European radiology · 2026Article
- Cerebrolysin after Endovascular Thrombectomy in Stroke: 12‑Month Functional Outcomes in a Propensity‑Matched Cohort.Translational stroke research · 2026Article
- Do scoring systems help us to estimate prognosis after mechanical thrombectomy? Data from the German Stroke Registry.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2026Article
- Coagulation Activation Markers Associate with Early Neurological Function and Infarct Volume in Acute Ischemic Stroke.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- A Retrospective Study of Outcome Predictive Models for Anterior Circulation Stroke Post-Endovascular Thrombectomy: Are CT-Derived Morphomics Useful?Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2026Article
- Comprehensive versus thrombectomy-capable stroke centers: a web-based model to predict outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- A Simple and Pragmatic Equation for Rapid Outcome Prediction in Endovascular Thrombectomy With Limited Information.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Demographic and Premorbid Clinical Factors Predict Modified Rankin Score in Large and Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Strokes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Mediating Effect of Intracranial Hemorrhage Status on the Relationship between the INR and Mortality in Patients with Ischemic Stroke.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for poor long-term prognosis in severe acute ischemic stroke after endovascular treatment based on LASSO regression.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- External validation of the MR PREDICTS@24H model: predicting functional outcome after endovascular treatment in stroke.BMJ neurology open · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting venous thromboembolism risk in post-surgery patients with cervical cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Prediction of Ischemic Stroke Functional Outcomes from Acute-Phase Noncontrast CT and Clinical Information.Radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Outcome prediction after endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke is important to patients, family members, and physicians. Objective: To develop and validate a model based on preprocedural and postprocedural characteristics to predict functional outcome for individual patients after EVT. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prediction model was developed using individual patient data from 7 randomized clinical trials, performed between December 2010 and December 2014. The model was developed within the Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke Trials (HERMES) collaboration and external validation in data from the Dutch Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry of patients treated in clinical practice between March 2014 and November 2017. Participants included patients from multiple centers throughout different countries in Europe, North America, East Asia, and Oceania (derivation cohort), and multiple centers in the Netherlands (validation cohort). Included were adult patients with a history of ischemic stroke from an intracranial large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation who underwent EVT within 12 hours of symptom onset or last seen well. Data were last analyzed in July 2022. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): A total of 19 variables were assessed by multivariable ordinal regression to predict functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) 90 days after EVT. Variables were routinely available 1 day after EVT. Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to optimize model fit vs model complexity. Probabilities for functional independence (mRS 0-2) and survival (mRS 0-5) were derived from the ordinal model. Model performance was expressed with discrimination (C statistic) and calibration. Results: A total of 781 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 [57-76] years; 414 men [53%]) constituted the derivation cohort, and 3260 patients (median [IQR] age, 72 [61-80] years; 1684 men [52%]) composed the validation cohort. Nine variables were included in the model: age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, prestroke mRS score, history of diabetes, occlusion location, collateral score, reperfusion grade, NIHSS score at 24 hours, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage 24 hours after EVT. External validation in the MR CLEAN Registry showed excellent discriminative ability for functional independence (C statistic, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.92) and survival (0.89; 95% CI, 0.88-0.90). The proportion of functional independence in the MR CLEAN Registry was systematically higher than predicted by the model (41% vs 34%), whereas observed and predicted survival were similar (72% vs 75%). The model was updated and implemented for clinical use. Conclusion and relevance: The prognostic tool MR PREDICTS@24H can be applied 1 day after EVT to accurately predict functional outcome for individual patients at 90 days and to provide reliable outcome expectations and personalize follow-up and rehabilitation plans. It will need further validation and updating for contemporary patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.