Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523110›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2024

Thematic Analysis of Psychosocial Stressors and Adaptive Coping Strategies Among Informal Caregivers of Patients Surviving ICU Admission for Coma.

David Y Hwang, Sarah M Bannon, Kate Meurer, Rina Kubota, Nithyashri Baskaran, Jisoo Kim, Qiang Zhang, Mira Reichman, Nathan S Fishbein, Kaitlyn Lichstein and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Understanding and addressing a 'difficult' family in ICU.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

David Y Hwang *Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 170 Manning Drive, CB# 7025, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7025, USA. david_hwang@med.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2150-4289
Sarah M Bannon *Department of Psychiatry, Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kate MeurerDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Rina KubotaDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nithyashri BaskaranDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jisoo KimDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Qiang ZhangDavid Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mira ReichmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nathan S FishbeinDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kaitlyn LichsteinDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Melissa MottaProgram in Trauma, Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susanne MuehlschlegelDepartment of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Michael E ReznikDepartment of Neurology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Matthew N JaffaDepartment of Neurointensive Care, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Claire J CreutzfeldtDepartment of Neurology, University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Corey R FehnelDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Amanda D TomlinsonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Craig A WilliamsonDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ana-Maria VranceanuDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
COMA-F Investigators
Harvard University · USYale University · USUniversity of Washington · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrown University · USHartford Hospital · USJacksonville College · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Recovering Together: Building resiliency in dyads of patients with an acute brain injury admitted to the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit and their informal caregiversR01NR019982 · NINR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VRANCEANU, ANA-MARIA · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Mentoring in technology enhanced mind body and lifestyle interventionsK24AT011760 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Ana-Maria Vranceanu · 2022 to 2026
$911k
Improving patient care in severe acute brain injury: a web/mobile/tablet-based communication and decision support tool for clinicians and families in the neuro-ICUR21NR020231 · NINR · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI HENNINGER, NILS, MUEHLSCHLEGEL, SUSANNE · 2022 to 2023
$461k
Mind-Body Peer Support for Family Caregivers to Patients with Severe Acute Brain InjuryF31AT012417 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mira Reichman · 2024 to 2026
$149k
NCCIH NIH HHS 1K24AT011760-01NCCIH NIH HHS F31 AT012417NCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT011760NINR NIH HHS 5R01NR019982-02NINR NIH HHS R01 NR019982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily caregivers of patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with coma experience heightened emotional distress stemming from simultaneous stressors. Stress and coping frameworks can inform psychosocial intervention development by elucidating common challenges and ways of navigating such experiences but have yet to be employed with this population. The present study therefore sought to use a stress and coping framework to characterize the stressors and coping behaviors of family caregivers of patients with SABI hospitalized in ICUs and recovering after coma.

methodsOur qualitative study recruited a convenience sample from 14 US neuroscience ICUs. Participants were family caregivers of patients who were admitted with ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; had experienced a comatose state for > 24 h; and completed or were scheduled for tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy tube placement. Participants were recruited < 7 days after transfer out of the neuroscience ICU. We conducted live online video interviews from May 2021 to January 2022. One semistructured interview per participant was recorded and subsequently transcribed. Recruitment was stopped when thematic saturation was reached. We deductively derived two domains using a stress and coping framework to guide thematic analysis. Within each domain, we inductively derived themes to comprehensively characterize caregivers' experiences.

resultsWe interviewed 30 caregivers. We identified 18 themes within the two theory-driven domains, including ten themes describing practical, social, and emotional stressors experienced by caregivers and eight themes describing the psychological and behavioral coping strategies that caregivers attempted to enact. Nearly all caregivers described using avoidance or distraction as an initial coping strategy to manage overwhelming emotions. Caregivers also expressed awareness of more adaptive strategies (e.g., cultivation of positive emotions, acceptance, self-education, and soliciting social and medical support) but had challenges employing them because of their heightened emotional distress.

conclusionsIn response to substantial stressors, family caregivers of patients with SABI attempted to enact various psychological and behavioral coping strategies. They described avoidance and distraction as less helpful than other coping strategies but had difficulty engaging in alternative strategies because of their emotional distress. These findings can directly inform the development of additional resources to mitigate the long-term impact of acute psychological distress among this caregiver population.

Indexed as

CaregiversCoping SkillsAdaptation, PsychologicalComaHumansIntensive Care UnitsComaFamily caregiversInformal caregiversInterview

Identifiers

PMID37523110
PMCPMC11426341
OpenAlexW4385406912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.