Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523062›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2023

Workplace and non-workplace cannabis use and the risk of workplace injury: Findings from a longitudinal study of Canadian workers.

Nancy Carnide, Victoria Landsman, Hyunmi Lee, Michael R Frone, Andrea D Furlan, Peter M Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An observational study of pain severity, cannabis use, and benefit expenditures in work disability.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nancy CarnideInstitute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ncarnide@iwh.on.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7892-5626
Victoria LandsmanInstitute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5238-3857
Hyunmi LeeInstitute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7390-3724
Michael R FroneDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4002-3947
Andrea D FurlanInstitute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6138-8510
Peter M SmithInstitute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8286-4563

Funding

CIHR PJT-162250CIHR SH1-155415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFindings of previous studies examining the relationship between cannabis use and workplace injury have been conflicting, likely due to methodological shortcomings, including cross-sectional designs and exposure measures that lack consideration for timing of use. The objective was to estimate the association between workplace cannabis use (before and/or at work) and non-workplace use and the risk of workplace injury.

methodsCanadian workers participating in a yearly longitudinal study (from 2018 to 2020) with at least two adjacent years of survey data comprised the analytic sample (n = 2745). The exposure was past-year workplace cannabis use (no past-year use, non-workplace use, workplace use). The outcome was past-year workplace injury (yes/no). Absolute risks and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated between workplace and non-workplace cannabis use at one time point and workplace injury at the following time point. Models were adjusted for personal and work variables and were also stratified by whether respondents' jobs were safety-sensitive.

resultsCompared to no past-year cannabis use, there was no difference in workplace injury risk for non-workplace cannabis use (RR 1.09, 95%CI 0.83-1.44). However, workplace use was associated with an almost two-fold increased risk of experiencing a workplace injury (RR 1.97, 95%CI 1.32-2.93). Findings were similar for workers in safety-sensitive and non-safety-sensitive work.

conclusionIt is important to distinguish between non-workplace and workplace use when considering workplace safety impacts of cannabis use. Findings have implications for workplace cannabis use policies and substantiate the need for worker education on the risks of workplace cannabis use.

Indexed as

Accidents, OccupationalCannabisOccupational InjuriesCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesOccupational HealthWorkplaceAccidents, occupationalCannabisHumansLongitudinal studiesOccupational groupsOccupational injuriesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID37523062
PMCPMC10661545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.