ReviewThe AAPS journal2023
PK/PD and Bioanalytical Considerations of AAV-Based Gene Therapies: an IQ Consortium Industry Position Paper.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AAV Gene Therapy Drug Development and Translation of Engineered Ocular and Neurotropic Capsids: A Systematic Review Using Natural Language Processing.Clinical and translational science · 2025Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization of CD8-targeted lentiviral vector forMolecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- QSP model for AAV-mediated antibody delivery in rat brain.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- Overcoming inconsistent DNA extraction recovery across tissue types in qPCR assays supporting biodistribution studies.Bioanalysis · 2026Article
- Calcium sulfide nanoparticles as sustained HFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Cell and Gene Therapy: Transforming Treatment Paradigms for Patient-Centric Care.Clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Validation of a Göttingen Minipig Gene Therapy Biodistribution Assay for AVGN7 Using Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of resveratrol in inducing adeno-associated virus as a potential definitive therapy for SCN5A mutation in Brugada syndrome: a narrative review.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
- A Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Study of Protosappanoside D, a Component Derived fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Prospective approaches to gene therapy computational modeling - spotlight on viral gene therapy.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Review
- A quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) platform for preclinical to clinical translation ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest and efforts to use recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAV) as gene therapy delivery tools to treat disease have grown exponentially. However, gaps in understanding of the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and disposition of this modality exist. This position paper comes from the Novel Modalities Working Group (WG), part of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ). The pan-industry WG effort focuses on the nonclinical PK and clinical pharmacology aspects of AAV gene therapy and related bioanalytical considerations.Traditional PK concepts are generally not applicable to AAV-based therapies due to the inherent complexity of a transgene-carrying viral vector, and the multiple steps and analytes involved in cell transduction and transgene-derived protein expression. Therefore, we explain PK concepts of biodistribution of AAV-based therapies and place key terminologies related to drug exposure and PD in the proper context. Factors affecting biodistribution are presented in detail, and guidelines are provided to design nonclinical studies to enable a stage-gated progression to Phase 1 testing. The nonclinical and clinical utility of transgene DNA, mRNA, and protein analytes are discussed with bioanalytical strategies to measure these analytes. The pros and cons of qPCR vs. ddPCR technologies for DNA/RNA measurement and qualitative vs. quantitative methods for transgene-derived protein are also presented. Last, best practices and recommendations for use of clinical and nonclinical data to project human dose and response are discussed. Together, the manuscript provides a holistic framework to discuss evolving concepts of PK/PD modeling, bioanalytical technologies, and clinical dose selection in gene therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37523051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.