Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523035›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024

Comparison of clean catch and bag urine using LC-MS/MS proteomics in infants.

Richard Klaus, Teresa K Barth, Axel Imhof, Franziska Thalmeier, Bärbel Lange-Sperandio

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard KlausDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Dr. V. Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Lindwurmstraße 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2234-4248
Teresa K BarthFaculty of Medicine, Biomedical Center, Protein Analysis Unit, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Planegg-Martinsried, Munich, Germany.
Axel ImhofFaculty of Medicine, Biomedical Center, Protein Analysis Unit, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Planegg-Martinsried, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2993-8249
Franziska ThalmeierDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Dr. V. Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Lindwurmstraße 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Bärbel Lange-SperandioDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Dr. V. Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Lindwurmstraße 4, 80337, Munich, Germany. baerbel.lange-sperandio@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8898-3459
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DECenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft INST 86/2058-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft La1257/5-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary proteomics identifies the totality of urinary proteins and can therefore help in getting an early and precise diagnosis of various pathological processes in the kidneys. In infants, non-invasive urine collection is most commonly accomplished with a urine bag or clean catch. The influence of those two collection methods on urinary proteomics was assessed in this study.

methodsThirty-two urine samples were collected in infants using urine bag and clean catch within 24 h. Nine boys and seven girls with a mean age of 4.3 ± 2.9 months were included (5 × post-pyelonephritis, 10 × non-kidney disease, 1 × chronic kidney disease (CKD)). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was performed in data-independent acquisition (DIA) mode. Protein identification and quantification were achieved using Spectronaut.

resultsA total of 1454 urinary proteins were detected. Albumin and α-1-microglobulin were detected the most. The 18 top-abundant proteins accounted for 50% of total abundance. The number of proteins was slightly, but insignificantly higher in clean catch (957 ± 245) than in bag urine (876 ± 255). The median intensity was 1.2 × higher in the clean catch. Overall, differential detection of proteins was 29% between the collection methods; however, it diminished to 3% in the 96 top-abundant proteins. Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.81 ± 0.11, demonstrating a high intraindividual correlation. A principal component analysis and a heat map showed clustering according to diagnoses and patients rather than to the collection method.

conclusionUrinary proteomics shows a high correlation with minor variation in low-abundant proteins between the two urine collection methods. The biological characteristics overrule this variation. Graphical abstract A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Indexed as

Urinary Tract InfectionsChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansInfantMaleProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryUrine Specimen CollectionChronic kidney diseaseInfantsLiquid chromatography-mass spectrometryUrinary proteomicsUrine collection

Identifiers

PMID37523035
PMCPMC10673958
OpenAlexW4385406586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.