Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37522930›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[External fixation for the correction of complex deformities : From the classic Ilizarov ring fixator to modern software-driven hexapod fixators].

Christof Radler

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christof RadlerAbteilung für Kinderorthopädie und Fußchirurgie, Orthopädisches Spital Speising GmbH, Speisinger Str. 109, 1130, Wien, Österreich. christof.radler@oss.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The history and development of circular fixation is closely aligned with the history of limb lengthening. Gavriil A. Ilizarov not only developed his circular fixator, but he also was the first to research and publish on distraction osteogenesis. Progress and dissemination of the method was initially based on individual pioneers; a standardized nomenclature and annual courses led to a wider dissemination. The introduction of the Taylor spatial frame in 1997 was a game changer. Although various groups had already developed Hexapod-fixators, it was the TSF that hit the market and achieved market presence. After the patent for TSF expired, many companies developed hexapod fixators with various modifications. A new version of the TSF, the Smart TSF, which included an intuitive planning software, was introduced in Baltimore in 2021. The introduction of intramedullary lengthening nails at the beginning of the 2000s and the wide dissemination starting approximately 2013 rendered external fixation obsolete for certain indications. However, ring fixators are still the method of choice for complex reconstruction of deformity in traumatology, as well as in pediatric orthopedics in the presence of open growth plates.

Indexed as

External FixatorsOsteogenesis, DistractionBone NailsChildFracture FixationHumansMaleSoftwareBone lengtheningCallusDistraction osteogenesisIlizarov methodLower limb

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.