Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37522759›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2022

Metaphor-A workflow for streamlined assembly and binning of metagenomes.

Vinícius W Salazar, Babak Shaban, Maria Del Mar Quiroga, Robert Turnbull, Edoardo Tescari, Vanessa Rossetto Marcelino, Heroen Verbruggen, Kim-Anh Lê Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vinícius W SalazarMelbourne Integrative Genomics, School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8362-3195
Babak ShabanMelbourne Data Analytics Platform (MDAP), University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7393-810X
Maria Del Mar QuirogaMelbourne Data Analytics Platform (MDAP), University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8943-2808
Robert TurnbullMelbourne Data Analytics Platform (MDAP), University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1274-6750
Edoardo TescariMelbourne Data Analytics Platform (MDAP), University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1157-4897
Vanessa Rossetto MarcelinoDepartment of Molecular and Translational Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1755-0597
Heroen VerbruggenSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6305-4749
Kim-Anh Lê CaoMelbourne Integrative Genomics, School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-1116

Funding

Medical Research Council GNT1159458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in bioinformatics and high-throughput sequencing have enabled the large-scale recovery of genomes from metagenomes. This has the potential to bring important insights as researchers can bypass cultivation and analyze genomes sourced directly from environmental samples. There are, however, technical challenges associated with this process, most notably the complexity of computational workflows required to process metagenomic data, which include dozens of bioinformatics software tools, each with their own set of customizable parameters that affect the final output of the workflow. At the core of these workflows are the processes of assembly-combining the short-input reads into longer, contiguous fragments (contigs)-and binning, clustering these contigs into individual genome bins. The limitations of assembly and binning algorithms also pose different challenges depending on the selected strategy to execute them. Both of these processes can be done for each sample separately or by pooling together multiple samples to leverage information from a combination of samples. Here we present Metaphor, a fully automated workflow for genome-resolved metagenomics (GRM). Metaphor differs from existing GRM workflows by offering flexible approaches for the assembly and binning of the input data and by combining multiple binning algorithms with a bin refinement step to achieve high-quality genome bins. Moreover, Metaphor generates reports to evaluate the performance of the workflow. We showcase the functionality of Metaphor on different synthetic datasets and the impact of available assembly and binning strategies on the final results.

Indexed as

MetagenomeMetaphorAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisWorkflowbioinformaticshigh-throughput sequencingMAGsmicrobial genomicspipelineSnakemake

Identifiers

PMID37522759
PMCPMC10388702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.