Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37522551›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Providers' Perspectives Related to Parents' Choice of Pediatric Provider of Record and Newborn Screening: A Qualitative Study.

Tracy Lowe, Jessica Boyd, Lina Shu, Jane M DeLuca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tracy LoweClemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1115-1405
Jessica BoydPRISMA Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA.
Lina ShuClemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, SC, USA.
Jane M DeLucaClemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, SC, USA.
Clemson University · USPrisma Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pediatric provider of record has a significant role in newborn screening and maintaining infant health after birth. Procedural errors and delays in communication can hinder the identification of infants with critical illnesses or follow up of unsatisfactory NBS samples. For this study, key stakeholders, including nurses, physicians, and midwives were interviewed to understand how the pediatric provider of record is selected by parents and examine factors affecting the newborn screening education and processes in the perinatal period. Provider responsibilities, timing of parent education, and social determinants of health played a role in parents' choices of the pediatric provider. Investment in future intervention programs is needed for reducing the number of infants without a designated pediatric provider of record. Research is needed to understand social complexities and healthcare systems which affect parents' choices of pediatric providers and newborn screening processes to optimize clinical outcomes for infants.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningPhysiciansChildCommunicationFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParentsPregnancyQualitative Researchnewbornnewborn screeningparental educationpediatric providersocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID37522551
PMCPMC10392150
OpenAlexW4385406479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.