Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37522502›Full record

ReviewSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2023

Role of imaging in morphea assessment: A review of the literature.

Faezeh Khorasanizadeh, Yasamin Kalantari, Ifa Etesami

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sclerosing diseases of the skin.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. High-frequency ultrasound evaluation of morphea: Retrospective analytical study.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Role of imaging in morphea assessment: A review of the literature.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faezeh KhorasanizadehDepartment of Radiology, Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Yasamin KalantariDepartment of Dermatology, Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8443-4591
Ifa EtesamiDepartment of Dermatology, Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3026-2485
Razi Hospital · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocalized scleroderma, known as morphea, is a connective tissue disorder characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the skin and the soft tissue. There exist no universally accepted validated outcome measures in order to monitor the disease activity. Besides clinical scores to evaluate outcome measures, imaging modalities are increasingly utilized in assessing patients with morphea, such as high-frequency ultrasonography (US), shear-wave elastography (SWE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the accuracy of these imaging modalities in monitoring morphea activity is not yet clear.

aimsTo review the literature regarding the role of imaging modalities in assessing patients with morphea. MATERIALS &

methodsIn this study, we searched the PubMed/Medline database for articles published from inception until February 2023.

resultsA total number of 23 original articles in three categories of US, elastography, and MRI were included. DISCUSSION: Regarding US, criteria, including increased dermal thickness, increased echogenicity of the subcutaneous tissue, and decreased dermal echogenicity, were indicators of active morphea lesions when using high frequencies probe (18-20 MHz) color Doppler sonography. Moreover, studies evaluating SWE, a novel method to quantitatively assess tissue stiffness, demonstrated increased dermal stiffness in active lesions.

conclusionStudies showed that MRI can help to determine the depth of disease, particularly as a first-line and follow-up diagnostic tool, especially in generalized and deep morphea. In addition, brain MRI may be useful for patients with localized craniofacial scleroderma experiencing new or worsening neurological symptoms.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesScleroderma, LocalizedHumansInflammationSkinUltrasonographyelastographylocalized sclerodermamorpheaMRIsonography

Identifiers

PMID37522502
PMCPMC10318382
OpenAlexW4383068811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.