ArticleThe Laryngoscope2024
Histologic Examination of Vocal Fold Mucosal Wave and Vibration.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A hybrid vocal fold phonatory platform for pediatric phonation modeling.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Thyroarytenoid muscle fiber orientation regulates the ability to modulate vocal fold vertical thickness.PloS one · 2025Article
- Morphological Evidence for a Unique Neuromuscular Functional Unit of the Human Vocalis Muscle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDespite gross anatomic and histologic differences between human and canine vocal folds, similar wave patterns have been described yet not fully characterized. We reconstructed vocal fold (VF) vibration in a canine hemilarynx and performed histologic examination of the same vocal fold. We demonstrate comparable wave patterns while exploring the importance of certain anatomic architectures.
methodsAn in vivo canine hemilarynx was phonated against a glass prism at low and high muscle activation conditions. Vibration was captured using high-speed video, and trajectories of VF medial surface tattooed landmarks were 3D-reconstructed. The method of empirical eigenfunctions was used to capture the essential dynamics of vibratory movement. Histologic examination of the hemilarynx was performed.
resultsOscillation patterns were highly similar between the in vivo canine and previous reports of ex vivo human models. The two most dominant eigenfunctions comprised over 90% of total variance of movement, representing opening/closing and convergent/divergent movement patterns, respectively. We demonstrate a vertical phase difference during the glottal cycle. The time delay between the inferior and superior VF was greater during opening than closing for both activation conditions. Histological examination of canine VF showed not only a thicker lamina propria layer superiorly but also a distinct pattern of thyroarytenoid muscle fibers and fascicles as described in human studies.
conclusionsHistologic and vibratory examination of the canine vocal fold demonstrated human vocal fold vibratory patterns despite certain microstructural differences. This study suggests that the multilayered lamina propria may not be fundamental to vibratory patterns necessary for human-like voice production. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA (Basic science study) Laryngoscope, 134:264-271, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.