ArticleNucleic acids research2023
Recovery of protein synthesis to assay DNA repair activity in transcribed genes in living cells and tissues.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment and detection of nucleotide excision repair capability in human cells: a critical review of current functional methods.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Molecular insights into DNA damage response plasticity in glioma stem cells.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair protects against genomic instability and cell death induced by the liver toxin methyleugenol.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Integrative Multiomics and Single-Cell Analyses Identify FKBP10 as a Predictor of Radiotherapy Outcome in Colorectal Cancer.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Chromatin context shapes DNA damage formation and nucleotide excision repair dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Transcription-coupled repair: tangled up in convoluted repair.The FEBS journal · 2025Review
- Transcription-Coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair: A Faster Solution or the Only Option?Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Chemical Switching: A Concept Inspired by Strategies from Biocatalysis and Organocatalysis.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair (TC-NER) is an important DNA repair mechanism that protects against the negative effects of transcription-blocking DNA lesions. Hereditary TC-NER deficiencies cause pleiotropic and often severe neurodegenerative and progeroid symptoms. While multiple assays have been developed to determine TC-NER activity for clinical and research purposes, monitoring TC-NER is hampered by the low frequency of repair events occurring in transcribed DNA. 'Recovery of RNA Synthesis' is widely used as indirect TC-NER assay based on the notion that lesion-blocked transcription only resumes after successful TC-NER. Here, we show that measuring novel synthesis of a protein after its compound-induced degradation prior to DNA damage induction is an equally effective but more versatile manner to indirectly monitor DNA repair activity in transcribed genes. This 'Recovery of Protein Synthesis' (RPS) assay can be adapted to various degradable proteins and readouts, including imaging and immunoblotting. Moreover, RPS allows real-time monitoring of TC-NER activity in various living cells types and even in differentiated tissues of living organisms. To illustrate its utility, we show that DNA repair in transcribed genes declines in aging muscle tissue of C. elegans. Therefore, the RPS assay constitutes an important novel clinical and research tool to investigate transcription-coupled DNA repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.