ArticleActa orthopaedica2023
Radiographic reference values of the central knee anatomy in 8-16-year-old children.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcome (28-40 years) after correction of leg length discrepancy through permanent epiphysiodesis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025Article
- No evidence of intra-articular knee deformity following growth arrest through temporary epiphysiodesis - a retrospective study of 81 patients.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Morphology of the knee after guided growth using tension-band devices: a retrospective multicenter study of 222 limbs and 285 implants.Acta orthopaedica · 2023Article
- [Options and limits of leg length correction in paediatric orthopaedics].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeFor correction of leg-length discrepancy or angular deformity of the lower limb in skeletally immature patients temporary or permanent (hemi-)epiphysiodesis can be employed. These are reliable treatments with few complications. Recently, radiographic analysis of treatment-related alterations of the central knee anatomy gained interest among pediatric orthopedic surgeons. To date the comparison and adequate interpretation of potential changes of the central knee anatomy is limited due to the lack of defined standardized radiographic references. We aimed to establish new reference values of the central knee anatomy. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of calibrated longstanding anteroposterior radiographs of 254 skeletally immature patients with a chronological age ranging from 8 to 16 years was conducted. The following radiographic parameters were assessed: (1) femoral floor angle, (2) tibial roof angle, (3) width at femoral physis, and (4) femoral notch-intercondylar distance.
resultsAll observed radiographic parameters were normally distributed with a mean age of 12.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.2-12.6). Mean femoral floor angle was 142° (SD 6, CI 141.8-142.9), mean tibial roof angle was 144° (SD 5, CI 143.7-144.1), mean width at femoral physis was 73 mm (SD 6, CI 72.8-73.9), and mean femoral notch-intercondylar distance was 8 mm (SD 1, CI 7.5-7.7). The estimated intraclass correlation coefficient values were excellent for all measurements.
conclusionThis study provides new radiographic reference values of the central knee anatomy for children between 8 and 16 years and we suggest considering values within the range of 2 SD as the physiological range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.