Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37522149›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental challenges (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Face masks: protecting the wearer but neglecting the aquatic environment? - A perspective from Bangladesh.

Neaz A Hasan, Richard D Heal, Abul Bashar, Mohammad Mahfujul Haque

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental challenges (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Facemask: Protection or threat?Marine pollution bulletin · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Adverse environmental effects of disposable face masks due to the excess usage.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Application of fenitrothion onToxicology reports · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Neaz A HasanDepartment of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Richard D HealCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth, United Kingdom.
Abul BasharDepartment of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Mahfujul HaqueDepartment of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Bangladesh Agricultural University · BDCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Bangladesh, as with many countries, the spread of COVID-19 made the wearing of single-use face masks, a non-pharmaceutical intervention to reduce viral transmission, surge in popularity amongst the general population. Consequently, irresponsible discarding of used masks into the environment, and mismanagement of the waste they produce, is potentially placing a large pollution burden on aquatic ecosystems in the country. Slow degradation of mask-derived polypropylene and polyethylene fibres creates large reservoirs of microplastic pollutants and these have acute and chronic effects on aquatic organism physiology. Using literature reviews, extrapolation of published data, and field observations, we present an emerging issue of pollution from COVID-19 personal protective equipment such as face masks in Bangladesh. We have estimated the volume of waste generated and document the potential consequences of its improper disposal, and subsequent degradation, in aquaculture ponds within country. In a field survey of 30 ponds in the Muktagacha upazilla, 76.7% were found to have plastics in contact with the water, or within 1m of the pond, and there was an average of 63 pieces of macro-plastic pollution per 5m

Indexed as

Aquatic environmentCOVID-19Face maskMicroplastic pollutionPolypropylene and polyethylene

Identifiers

PMID37522149
PMCPMC9040459
OpenAlexW3158204376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.