Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37522091›Full record

ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2022

Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital workers in Kobe: A cross-sectional survey.

Haruko Fukushima, Hissei Imai, Chisato Miyakoshi, Hiroyuki Miyai, Kyohei Otani, Shinsuke Aoyama, Kunitaka Matsuishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haruko FukushimaDepartment of Psychiatry Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Kobe Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8616-8813
Hissei ImaiHealth Promotion and Human Behavior, Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health Kyoto University, Kyoto, and Ohashi Clinic Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-5188
Chisato MiyakoshiDepartment of Research Support, Center for Clinical Research and Innovation Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Kobe Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6882-7053
Hiroyuki MiyaiDepartment of Psychiatry Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Kobe Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5903-7559
Kyohei OtaniDepartment of Psychiatry Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Kobe Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-8031
Shinsuke AoyamaDepartment of Psychiatry Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4421-4444
Kunitaka MatsuishiDepartment of Psychiatry Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Kobe Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-8164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Many health-care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are psychologically distressed. This study aimed to investigate the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital workers under the emergency declaration in Japan. Methods: This cross-sectional, survey-based study collected sociodemographic data and responses to 19 stress-related questions and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), which measures post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, from all 3217 staff members at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital from April 16, 2020 to June 8, 2020. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to the 19 stress-related questions. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate the association of personal characteristics with each score of the four factors and the IES-R. Results: We received 951 valid responses; 640 of these were by females, and 311 were by respondents aged in their 20s. Nurses accounted for the largest percentage of the job category. Women, those aged in their 30s-50s, nurses, and frontline workers had a high risk of experiencing stress. The prevalence of stress (IES-R ≥ 25) was 16.7%. The psychological impact was significantly greater for those aged in their 30s-50s and those who were not medical doctors. Conclusions: This is the first study to examine the stress of hospital workers, as measured by the IES-R, under the emergency declaration in Japan. It showed that women, those aged in their 30s-50s, nurses, and frontline workers have a high risk of experiencing stress. Health and medical institutions should pay particular attention to the physical and psychological health of these staff members.

Indexed as

COVID‐19 pandemichealth‐care workersmental healthpsychological distressquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID37522091
PMCPMC9088612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.