Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37522085›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Automated T1 and T2 mapping segmentation on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning.

András Kalapos, Liliána Szabó, Zsófia Dohy, Máté Kiss, Béla Merkely, Bálint Gyires-Tóth, Hajnalka Vágó

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A systematic review of machine learning in heart disease prediction.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025
    Review
  5. Towards a cardiovascular magnetic resonance foundation model for multi-task cardiac image analysis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Article
  6. Recent Progress of Cardiac MRI for Nuclear Medicine Professionals.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

András KalaposDepartment of Telecommunications and Media Informatics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Liliána SzabóSemmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Centre, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsófia DohySemmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Centre, Budapest, Hungary.
Máté KissSiemens Healthcare, Budapest, Hungary.
Béla MerkelySemmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Centre, Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint Gyires-TóthDepartment of Telecommunications and Media Informatics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Hajnalka VágóSemmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Centre, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Structural and functional heart abnormalities can be examined non-invasively with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Thanks to the development of MR devices, diagnostic scans can capture more and more relevant information about possible heart diseases. T1 and T2 mapping are such novel technology, providing tissue specific information even without the administration of contrast material. Artificial intelligence solutions based on deep learning have demonstrated state-of-the-art results in many application areas, including medical imaging. More specifically, automated tools applied at cine sequences have revolutionized volumetric CMR reporting in the past five years. Applying deep learning models to T1 and T2 mapping images can similarly improve the efficiency of post-processing pipelines and consequently facilitate diagnostic processes. Methods: In this paper, we introduce a deep learning model for myocardium segmentation trained on over 7,000 raw CMR images from 262 subjects of heterogeneous disease etiology. The data were labeled by three experts. As part of the evaluation, Dice score and Hausdorff distance among experts is calculated, and the expert consensus is compared with the model's predictions. Results: Our deep learning method achieves 86% mean Dice score, while contours provided by three experts on the same data show 90% mean Dice score. The method's accuracy is consistent across epicardial and endocardial contours, and on basal, midventricular slices, with only 5% lower results on apical slices, which are often challenging even for experts. Conclusions: We trained and evaluated a deep learning based segmentation model on 262 heterogeneous CMR cases. Applying deep neural networks to T1 and T2 mapping could similarly improve diagnostic practices. Using the fine details of T1 and T2 mapping images and high-quality labels, the objective of this research is to approach human segmentation accuracy with deep learning.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac segmentationdeep learningMRIT1 and T2 mapping

Identifiers

PMID37522085
PMCPMC10374405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.