ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2023
EEG-based functional connectivity for tactile roughness discrimination.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electroencephalography-based neural indicators of texture preference for cosmetic formulations.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Dynamic brain functional states associated with inhibition control under different altitudes.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tactile sensation and perception involve cooperation between different parts of the brain. Roughness discrimination is an important phase of texture recognition. In this study, we investigated how different roughness levels would influence the brain network characteristics. We recorded EEG signals from nine right-handed healthy subjects who underwent touching three surfaces with different levels of roughness. The experiment was separately repeated in 108 trials for each hand for both static and dynamic touch. For estimation of the functional connectivity between brain regions, the phase lag index method was employed. Frequency-specific connectivity patterns were observed in the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres to the hand of interest, for delta, theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands under the study. A number of connections were identified to be in charge of discrimination between surfaces in both alpha and beta frequency bands for the left hand in static touch and for the right hand in dynamic touch. In addition, common connections were determined in both hands for all three roughness in alpha band for static touch and in theta band for dynamic touch. The common connections were identified for the smooth surface in beta band for static touch and in delta and alpha bands for dynamic touch. As observed for static touch in alpha band and for dynamic touch in theta band, the number of common connections between the two hands was decreased by increasing the surface roughness. The results of this research would extend the current knowledge about tactile information processing in the brain. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-022-09876-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.