Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521940›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Strategies for identifying stable lentil cultivars (

Muraleedhar S Aski, Gyan Prakash Mishra, Jayanti P Tokkas, Prachi S Yadav, Neha Rai, Ruchi Bansal, Akanksha Singh, Sanjeev Gupta, Jitendra Kumar, Ashok Parihar and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Muraleedhar S AskiDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Gyan Prakash MishraDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Jayanti P TokkasDivision of Biochemistry, Chaudhary Charan Singh (CCS), Hissar Agricultural University, Hissar, Haryana, India.
Prachi S YadavDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Neha RaiDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Ruchi BansalDivision of Plant Physiology, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Akanksha SinghAmity Institute of Organic Agriculture, Amity University, Noida, India.
Sanjeev GuptaKrishi Bhavan, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Delhi, India.
Jitendra KumarDivision of Crop Improvement, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) - Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, UP, India.
Ashok PariharDivision of Crop Improvement, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) - Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, UP, India.
Shiv KumarRegional Research Station, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), New Delhi, India.
Vinod KumarRegional Agricultural Research Station, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya (JNKVV), Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ashok Kumar SaxsenaRVSKVV-Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics, College of Agriculture, Sehore, MP, India.
Tapas Ranjan DasDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Anil KumarDepartment of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Bihar Agricultural College, Bihar Agriculture University, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India.
Harsh Kumar DikshitDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · INJawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya · INAmity University · INBihar Agricultural University · INChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University · INIndian Institute of Pulses Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron and zinc malnutrition is a global humanitarian concern that mostly affects newborns, children, and women in low- and middle-income countries where plant-based diets are regularly consumed. This kind of malnutrition has the potential to result in a number of immediate and long-term implications, including stunted growth, an elevated risk of infectious diseases, and poor development, all of which may ultimately cause children to not develop to the fullest extent possible. A determination of the contributions from genotype, environment, and genotype by environment interactions is necessary for the production of nutrient-dense lentil varieties that offer greater availability of iron and zinc with a high level of trait stability. Understanding the genotype and environmental parameters that affect G x E (Genotype x Environment) interactions is essential for plant breeding. We used GGE(Genotype, Genotype x Environment interactions) and AMMI (Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction) models to study genetic stability and GE(Genotype x Environment interactions) for grain Fe, Zn, Al, and anti-nutritional factors like phytic acid content in sixteen commercially produced lentil cultivars over several different six geographical locations across India. Significant genetic variability was evident in the Fe and Zn levels of different genotypes of lentils. The amounts of grain iron, zinc, and phytic acid varied from 114.10 to 49.90 mg/kg, 74.62 to 21.90 mg/kg, and 0.76 to 2.84 g/100g (dw) respectively. The environment and GE (Genotype x Environment interactions) had an impact on the concentration of grain Fe, Zn, and phytic acid (PA). Heritability estimations ranged from low to high (53.18% to 99.48%). The study indicated strong correlation between the contents of Fe and Zn, a strategy for simultaneously increasing Fe and Zn in lentils may be recommended. In addition, our research revealed that the stable and ideal lentil varieties L4076 (Pusa Shivalik) for Fe concentration and L4717 (Pusa Ageti) for Zn content, which have lower phytic acid contents, will not only play an essential role as stable donors in the lentil bio-fortification but will also enable the expansion of the growing area of bio-fortified crops for the security of health and nutrition.

Indexed as

anti-nutrientsbio-fortificationgrain zinchidden hungerlentil grain ironmicro-nutrientsphytic acidstability

Identifiers

PMID37521940
PMCPMC10374012
OpenAlexW4384155357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.