Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521926›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Comparative genomic analysis of 5M

Inderjit S Yadav, Nidhi Rawat, Parveen Chhuneja, Satinder Kaur, Christobal Uauy, Gerard Lazo, Yong Q Gu, Jaroslav Doležel, Vijay K Tiwari

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Inderjit S YadavDepartment of Plant Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Nidhi RawatDepartment of Plant Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Parveen ChhunejaSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Satinder KaurSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Christobal UauyCrops Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Gerard LazoAgricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Albany, CA, United States.
Yong Q GuAgricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Albany, CA, United States.
Jaroslav DoleželCentre of Plant Structural and Functional Genomics, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czechia.
Vijay K TiwariDepartment of Plant Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
University of Maryland, College Park · USPunjab Agricultural University · INUnited States Department of Agriculture · USCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZJohn Innes Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat is one of the most important cereal crops for the global food security. Due to its narrow genetic base, modern bread wheat cultivars face challenges from increasing abiotic and biotic stresses. Since genetic improvement is the most sustainable approach, finding novel genes and alleles is critical for enhancing the genetic diversity of wheat. The tertiary gene pool of wheat is considered a gold mine for genetic diversity as novel genes and alleles can be identified and transferred to wheat cultivars.

Indexed as

Aegilops geniculataAegilops umbellulatadiseasegenehomoeologousresistancesequencingwheat

Identifiers

PMID37521926
PMCPMC10373596
OpenAlexW4384205726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.