ArticleArthroplasty today2023
Magnetic Resonance Safety Evaluation of a Novel Alumina Matrix Composite Ceramic Knee and Image Artifact Comparison to a Metal Knee Implant of Analogous Design.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Open-Source Simulator of Imaging Near Metal at Arbitrary Magnetic Field Strengths.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Optimization of a bearing geometry for a cervical total disc replacement.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Computational modeling of the thermal effects of flow on radio frequency-induced heating of peripheral vascular stents during MRI.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Image artifacts caused by metal knee implants in 1.5T and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems complicate imaging-based diagnosis of the peri-implant region after total knee arthroplasty. Alternatively, metal-free knee prostheses could effectively minimize MRI safety hazards and offer the potential for higher quality diagnostic images. Methods: A novel knee arthroplasty device composed of BIOLOX Results: Magnetically induced displacement force and magnetically induced torque results of the AMC ceramic knee indicated that these effects do not pose a known risk in a clinical MR environment, as assessed in a 3T magnetic field. Moreover, minimal radiofrequency-induced heating of the device was observed. In addition, the AMC ceramic knee demonstrated minimal MR image artifacts (7 mm) in comparison to a cobalt-chromium knee (88 mm). The extremely low magnetic susceptibility of AMC (2 ppm) underlines that it is a nonmetallic and nonmagnetic material well suited for the manufacturing of MR Safe orthopaedic implants. Conclusions: The AMC ceramic knee is a novel metal-free total knee arthroplasty device that can be regarded as MR Safe, as suggested by the absence of hazards from the exposure of this implant to a MR environment. The AMC ceramic knee presents the advantage of being scanned with superior imaging results in 3T MRI systems compared to alternative metal implants on the market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.