ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Medical prediction from missing data with max-minus negative regularized dropout.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Missing data is a naturally common problem faced in medical research. Imputation is a widely used technique to alleviate this problem. Unfortunately, the inherent uncertainty of imputation would make the model overfit the observed data distribution, which has a negative impact on the model generalization performance. R-Drop is a powerful technique to regularize the training of deep neural networks. However, it fails to differentiate the positive and negative samples, which prevents the model from learning robust representations. To handle this problem, we propose a novel negative regularization enhanced R-Drop scheme to boost performance and generalization ability, particularly in the context of missing data. The negative regularization enhanced R-Drop additionally forces the output distributions of positive and negative samples to be inconsistent with each other. Especially, we design a new max-minus negative sampling technique that uses the maximum in-batch values to minus the mini-batch to yield the negative samples to provide sufficient diversity for the model. We test the resulting max-minus negative regularized dropout method on three real-world medical prediction datasets, including both missing and complete cases, to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.