Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521692›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Medical prediction from missing data with max-minus negative regularized dropout.

Lvhui Hu, Xiaoen Cheng, Chuanbiao Wen, Yulan Ren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lvhui HuSchool of Intelligent Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoen ChengSchool of Intelligent Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Chuanbiao WenSchool of Intelligent Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yulan RenSinology College of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missing data is a naturally common problem faced in medical research. Imputation is a widely used technique to alleviate this problem. Unfortunately, the inherent uncertainty of imputation would make the model overfit the observed data distribution, which has a negative impact on the model generalization performance. R-Drop is a powerful technique to regularize the training of deep neural networks. However, it fails to differentiate the positive and negative samples, which prevents the model from learning robust representations. To handle this problem, we propose a novel negative regularization enhanced R-Drop scheme to boost performance and generalization ability, particularly in the context of missing data. The negative regularization enhanced R-Drop additionally forces the output distributions of positive and negative samples to be inconsistent with each other. Especially, we design a new max-minus negative sampling technique that uses the maximum in-batch values to minus the mini-batch to yield the negative samples to provide sufficient diversity for the model. We test the resulting max-minus negative regularized dropout method on three real-world medical prediction datasets, including both missing and complete cases, to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Indexed as

dropoutmedical predictionmissing datanegative samplingregularization

Identifiers

PMID37521692
PMCPMC10373302
OpenAlexW4384204492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.