ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2023
A Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effect of Topical Refrigerant Spray on the Perception of an Instantaneous Noxious Stimulus.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hand Surgery Anaesthesia Innovations: Balancing Efficiency, Cost, and Comfort with WALANT, Ultrasound, and Emerging Adjuncts-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Perineural Hydrodissection as a Minimally Invasive Treatment in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Topical refrigerant spray is commonly used with routine hand injections despite mixed evidence about its efficacy in reducing the pain experience. We hypothesize that the use of topical refrigerant spray decreases the pain experience of an instantaneous noxious stimulus. Methods: Eighty adult volunteer participants were enrolled in the study. We constructed an instrument using the smooth end of a Kirschner wire mounted to the spring of a ballpoint pen to apply an instantaneous noxious stimulus to the long (middle) finger proximal nail fold. Participants completed two trials and were randomized to receive the topical refrigerant spray before either the first or second stimulus and on either the left or right side. Participants were asked to rate the pain of each experience using an 11-point Likert scale and indicate which condition they preferred, if any. Results: The mean pain ratings for the spray and no-spray conditions were 2.0 and 4.3, respectively, giving a mean difference of -2.3 ( Conclusions: The use of topical refrigerant spray significantly decreased the perception of pain from an instantaneous noxious stimulus. A significant majority of participants also preferred the topical refrigerant spray condition. The use of topical refrigerant spray for painful procedures, such as needle insertions, may improve the overall patient experience. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.