ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2023
The Effect of Metacarpal Shortening on Finger Strength and Joint Motion: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Arterialized Venous Flaps to Preserve Full Digital Length in Revascularization of Partially Amputated Digits: Two Cases.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Dorsal Cortical Alignment Predicts Functional Outcomes in Proximal Phalangeal Fractures Treated with Intramedullary Headless Compression Screws but Not in Metacarpal Fractures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of metacarpal shortening on finger strength following non-surgical treatment of spiral and oblique metacarpal shaft fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Predicting Metacarpal Anatomic Lengths via Adjacent Metacarpals.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Discrepancies exist between previous biomechanical and clinical studies when determining acceptable metacarpal shortening after metacarpal fractures. This study aimed to determine the amount of acceptable shortening after a metacarpal fracture before finger motion and strength is compromised. Methods: We defrosted ten fresh-frozen cadaveric hands. A screw-driven external fixator was placed to stabilize the metacarpal, then a 15.0-mm section of the index metacarpal was excised and replaced with a three dimensional-printed, custom-designed polyethylene insert. The hand was then mounted on a custom testing rig, and the index finger was flexed using the flexor digitorum profundus tendon. Joint angles and fingertip force were recorded as the finger was flexed. Incrementally smaller inserts were placed, and testing was repeated. Results: The average joint angles of the intact condition for the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints were (54 [SD = 13], 79 [SD = 21], and 73 [SD = 10]), respectively. There were no statistically significant changes to any joint angle with any amount of shortening. The maximal fingertip contact pressures were 41 N (17), 31 N (12), 24 N (14), 19 N, (11), and 14 N (8) for the 15 mm, 12.5 mm, 10 mm, 7.5 mm, and 5 mm inserts, respectively. All changes in fingertip force by insert size were statistically significant. Conclusion: Metacarpal shortening does not affect flexion range of motion regardless of the amount of shortening, but it significantly affects finger strength. The loss of strength after shortening was approximately 6.5% per mm of shortening for the fractured metacarpal. Clinical Relevance: When viewed in the context of the hand as a whole and the contribution of the index finger to grip being only 23.5%, it is unlikely that any shortening will significantly affect the average patient regarding grip strength. However, for a patient who requires fine motor strength, any amount of shortening may affect their finger function and needs to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.