ReviewMaterials today. Bio2023
Physical stimuli-emitting scaffolds: The role of piezoelectricity in tissue regeneration.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-activated trilayer piezoelectric bio-adhesive for rapid repair and antibacterial treatment of gastrointestinal perforation.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Reconstructing the Periosteal Niche with Regenerated Cellulose Nanofibers for Endogenous Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- A biodegradable piezoelectric vertebral implant for programmable electro-neuromodulation in spinal cord injury.Science advances · 2026Article
- Mastication-Induced Electrical Stimulation Activates Prg4Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Bone-like Collagen Matrices Through Rapid Intrafibrillar Mineralisation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Electroactive Biomaterials for Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering: Mechanisms, Design Strategies, and Therapeutic Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Advances in electrical stimulation-based therapeutic technologies for sarcopenia prevention and treatment.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Application of ultrasound and ultrasound-responsive materials in wounds: A systematic review.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Immunomodulatory piezoelectric master electrospun membranes for pelvic floor repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Cotton-Type Nanofiber Guided Pathway Engineering Enables Rapid Tissue Integration and Accelerated Bone Regeneration in Mineral Powder-Based Bone Grafts.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Piezo channels in tumors.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-activated piezoelectric Silk-PVDF hydrogel reprograms the osteoimmune microenvironment via NRF2 signaling for accelerated bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- From physical modalities to energy-responsive biomaterials: Current strategies and challenges in tendon-to-bone healing.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Exercise-Based Mechanotherapy: From Biomechanical Principles and Mechanotransduction to Precision Regenerative Rehabilitation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Recent advances in piezoelectric hydrogels for osteoarthritis therapy: material design, signal transduction, and clinical translation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Application of electrospun piezoelectric nanofibers in wound healing.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Conductive Nerve Guidance Conduits Loaded With Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.Smart medicine · 2025Article
- Recent advances in polymer-based drug delivery systems for atopic dermatitis: enhancing therapeutic efficacy and outcomes.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Open Challenges and Opportunities in Piezoelectricity for Tissue Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Piezoelectric electrospun scaffold incorporating ibuprofen loaded ultrasound-responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles for tissue regeneration.RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The imbalance between life expectancy and quality of life is increasing due to the raising prevalence of chronic diseases. Musculoskeletal disorders and chronic wounds affect a growing percentage of people and demand more efficient tools for regenerative medicine. Scaffolds that can better mimic the natural physical stimuli that tissues receive under healthy conditions and during healing may significantly aid the regeneration process. Shape, mechanical properties, pore size and interconnectivity have already been demonstrated to be relevant scaffold features that can determine cell adhesion and differentiation. Much less attention has been paid to scaffolds that can deliver more dynamic physical stimuli, such as electrical signals. Recent developments in the precise measurement of electrical fields
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.