ArticleArab journal of urology2023
Can we offer additional BCG therapy for three-month BCG refractory high grade/T1, Tis bladder cancer patients?
Article in Arab journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- NQO1-Mediated Anoikis Resistance and Immune Evasion Define a High-Risk Multi-Omic Subtype for Precision Management of T1 High-Grade Bladder Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of microbiome-immune interactions in bladder cancer and targeted regulatory strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Extracellular vesicles as emerging platforms for modulating innate immune responses in sepsis-associated acute lung injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We lack tools to predict treatment and survival outcomes in patients receiving additional BCG therapy as a bladder-preserving therapy in high grade/T1, Tis NMIBC patients who showed persistent/recurrent tumors at three-month follow-up. Objectives: To assess the predictors of additional BCG response in patients who experienced persistent/recurrent tumors at three-month follow-up after BCG induction. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed database for NMIBC. Between 2000 and 2019, 231 patients with high-grade T1/Tis NMIBC showed persistent/recurrent tumors at 3-month after BCG-induction, refused or were unfit to radical cystectomy (RC) and were offered additional intravesical BCG as bladder-preserving treatment. Predictors of the outcome after additional BCG were studied using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Kaplan Meier curve was utilized to estimate the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). COX regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors or RFS and PFS. Results: During a median (range) of 148 (24-224) months, poor response to additional BCG (tumor recurrence and/or progression) was noted in 112 (48.5%) patients. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, 3-month tumor features (persistent T stage, persistent grade and persistent/new CIS) significantly predicted poor response to additional BCG (OR: 3.4, 95%CI: 1.3-10.8, p = 0.021, OR: 2.1, 95%CI: 1.1-4.1, p = 0.02 and OR: 16.6, 95%CI: 4.5-109, Conclusions: Three-month tumor features could be utilized as a tool to predict treatment outcomes and survival benefits when additional intravesical BCG is utilized as a bladder-preserving treatment in patients with recurrent/persistent tumors at three-month follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.