ArticleZeitschrift fur bildungsforschung2022
[The COVID-19 pandemic in the school year 2020/21: How did the basic cognitive abilities of primary school children develop?]
Article in Zeitschrift fur bildungsforschung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In current empirical educational research, one important question is how the societal measures taken to contain the COVID-19 pandemic affected students' cognitive development. This also raises the question whether disadvantaged student groups suffered particular disadvantages in their cognitive development depending on their individual characteristics or family background. We analyzed a data set of 104 students of three Austrian elementary schools (Grade 3). Students' basic cognitive abilities were assessed by two subscales (inductive reasoning, numerical thinking) of the Cognitive Abilities Test 1-3 (KFT 1-3; Heller and Geisler 1983). We also analyzed effects of students' individual characteristics and indicators of their home learning environment. Basic cognitive abilities were assessed at the beginning and end of the 2020/21 school year and thus before and after societal and school-related measures to contain the second and third pandemic waves in Austria (including contact restrictions, school closures, distance learning and quarantine measures). According to intelligence research (Rindermann 2011), an age-appropriate development in students' mean test performance of about d = 0.40 would have been expected over the nine-months study period. Empirically, however, there were no significant changes in the average and heterogeneity of students' test performances. At the same time, children from homes with a higher parental educational background and those with more digital devices and internet access showed a significantly higher development. The findings thus indicate that, on average, the children did not develop as positively in the school year characterized by pandemic containment measures as would have been expected. Beyond this, our results indicate cognitive losses among disadvantaged student groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.