Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521345›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Prediction tool for renal adaptation after living kidney donation using interpretable machine learning.

Junseok Jeon, Jae Yong Yu, Yeejun Song, Weon Jung, Kyungho Lee, Jung Eun Lee, Wooseong Huh, Won Chul Cha, Hye Ryoun Jang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Brief Review of Artificial Intelligence in Living Kidney Donation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Junseok JeonDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Yong YuDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yeejun SongDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Weon JungSmart Health Lab, Research Institute of Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyungho LeeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung Eun LeeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Wooseong HuhDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won Chul ChaDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hye Ryoun JangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sungkyunkwan University · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSamsung (South Korea) · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Post-donation renal outcomes are a crucial issue for living kidney donors considering young donors' high life expectancy and elderly donors' comorbidities that affect kidney function. We developed a prediction model for renal adaptation after living kidney donation using interpretable machine learning. Methods: The study included 823 living kidney donors who underwent nephrectomy in 2009-2020. AutoScore, a machine learning-based score generator, was used to develop a prediction model. Fair and good renal adaptation were defined as post-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m Results: The mean age was 45.2 years; 51.6% were female. The model included pre-donation demographic and laboratory variables, GFR measured by diethylenetriamine pentaacetate scan, and computed tomography kidney volume/body weight of both kidneys and the remaining kidney. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.846 (95% confidence interval, 0.762-0.930) and 0.626 (0.541-0.712), while the areas under the precision-recall curve were 0.965 (0.944-0.978) and 0.709 (0.647-0.788) for fair and good renal adaptation, respectively. An interactive clinical decision support system was developed. Conclusion: The prediction tool for post-donation renal adaptation showed good predictive capability and may help clinical decisions through an easy-to-use web-based application.

Indexed as

AutoScorekidney transplantationliving donormachine learningrenal adaptation

Identifiers

PMID37521345
PMCPMC10375292
OpenAlexW4384282542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.