ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2023
Machine learning enhanced cell tracking.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Celldetective, an AI-enhanced image analysis tool for unraveling dynamic cell interactions.eLife · 2026Article
- Single-cell morphodynamics predict cell fate decisions during mucociliary epithelial differentiation.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Lights up on the embryonic dance: tools and applications of optogenetics in developmental biology.Genes & development · 2026Review
- easytrack: A napari plugin for automated parameter tuning in cell tracking.microPublication biology · 2026Article
- Contrastive learning for cell division detection and tracking in live cell imaging data.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Single-cell morphodynamics predict cell fate decisions during mucociliary epithelial differentiation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Label-free live cell recognition and tracking for biological discoveries and translational applications.Npj imaging · 2024Review
- Revolutionary Point-of-Care Wearable Diagnostics for Early Disease Detection and Biomarker Discovery through Intelligent Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Optical microscopic imaging, manipulation, and analysis methods for morphogenesis research.Microscopy (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying cell biology in space and time requires computational methods to detect cells, measure their properties, and assemble these into meaningful trajectories. In this aspect, machine learning (ML) is having a transformational effect on bioimage analysis, now enabling robust cell detection in multidimensional image data. However, the task of cell tracking, or constructing accurate multi-generational lineages from imaging data, remains an open challenge. Most cell tracking algorithms are largely based on our prior knowledge of cell behaviors, and as such, are difficult to generalize to new and unseen cell types or datasets. Here, we propose that ML provides the framework to learn aspects of cell behavior using cell tracking as the task to be learned. We suggest that advances in representation learning, cell tracking datasets, metrics, and methods for constructing and evaluating tracking solutions can all form part of an end-to-end ML-enhanced pipeline. These developments will lead the way to new computational methods that can be used to understand complex, time-evolving biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.