ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Prediction model for long-term seizure and developmental outcomes among children with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcome in children with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome: a multicenter retrospective study in Korea.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict prognostic outcomes in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Predictive model for initial response to first-line treatment in children with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Infantile epileptic spasm syndrome: predictors of short- and long-term outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Resting-State Functional MRI and PET Imaging as Noninvasive Tools to Study (Ab)Normal Neurodevelopment in Humans and Rodents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Risk of autism spectrum disorder in children with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome: a retrospective study in a single center in Brazil.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Children with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) are likely to experience poor outcomes. Researchers have investigated the factors related to its long-term prognosis; however, none of them developed a predictive model. Objective: This study aimed to clarify the factors that influence the long-term prognosis of seizures and their development and to create a prediction model for IESS. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study enrolling participants diagnosed with IESS at the Tottori University Hospital. We examined the seizure and developmental status at 3 and 7 years after the IESS onset and divided the participants into favorable and poor outcome groups. Subsequently, we analyzed the factors associated with the poor outcome group and developed a prediction model at 3 years by setting cutoff values using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Data were obtained from 44 patients with IESS (19 female patients and 25 male patients). Three years after epileptic spasms (ES) onset, seizure and development were the poor outcomes in 15 (34.9%) and 27 (61.4%) patients, respectively. The persistence of ES or tonic seizures (TS) after 90 days of onset, moderate or severe magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities, and developmental delay before IESS onset were significantly associated with poor outcomes. Seven years after the onset of ES, seizures and development were the poor outcomes in 9 (45.0%) and 13 (72.2%) patients, respectively. We found that no factor was significantly associated with poor seizure outcomes, and only developmental delay before IESS onset was significantly associated with poor developmental outcomes. Our prediction model demonstrated 86.7% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity for predicting poor seizure outcomes and 88.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity for predicting poor developmental outcomes. Conclusion: Our prediction model may be useful for predicting the long-term prognosis of seizures and their development after 3 years. Understanding the long-term prognosis during the initial treatment may facilitate the selection of appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.