Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521267›Full record

ArticleJournal of outdoor recreation and tourism2023

Cases and context: Mask-related behaviors among U.S. trail visitors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ingrid E Schneider, Christopher J Wynveen, Julian Wolfson, Kim Shinew, Taylor Stein, William W Hendricks, Heather Gibson, Deonne VanderWoude, Megha Budruk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of outdoor recreation and tourism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ingrid E SchneiderUniversity of Minnesota (Dept of Forest Resources), 1530 Cleveland Avenue North, 55108, St Paul, MN, USA.
Christopher J WynveenBaylor University (Health, Human Performance and Recreation), One Bear Place #97311, 76798-7311, Waco, TX, USA.
Julian WolfsonUniversity of Minnesota (School of Public Health), A460 Mayo Memorial Building MMC 303, 425 Delaware St SE, 55455, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kim ShinewUniversity of Illinois, (Department of Recreation, Sport and Tourism), 110 Huff Hall, 1205 South 4th Street, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.
Taylor SteinUniversity of Florida (School of Forest Resources), 353 Newins-Ziegler Hall, PO Box 110410, 32611-0410, Gainesville, FL, USA.
William W HendricksCalifornia Polytechnic State University (College of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA.
Heather GibsonUniversity of Florida (Department of Tourism, Hospitality & Event Management), PO Box 118209, Gainesville, 32611, FL, USA.
Deonne VanderWoudeCity of Boulder (Open Space and Mountain Parks), 2520 55th Street, 80301, Boulder, CO, USA.
Megha BudrukArizona State University (School of Community Resources and Development), 411 North Central Avenue, Suite 550, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenge of simultaneously providing outdoor recreation opportunities while protecting the public from SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 transmission, as well as future pandemics, remains foremost on managers' minds. Safe spaces and cultures are paramount for managers and visitors alike. Recommended protective measures against COVID-19 included physically distancing 1.8 m (six-feet) between parties and mask-wearing when distancing is not possible. Adoption of these protective measures is relatively unknown but essential to inform recreation management and planning through future health crises. Such adoption is likely influenced by both the pandemic context and site context, particularly related to visitor density. An observational study assessed mask-wearing behaviors among trail walkers on multiple trails in the United States from November 2020 through May 2021. Trained observers identified if walking groups were prepared to mask or had masks correctly worn as well as if encounters were compliant with the 1.8 m recommendations. Data collected across seven U.S. states enabled comparisons of mask-related behaviors across sites as well as considerations to: the influence of the pandemic context in terms of cases and vaccination rates, mask mandates, and trail density. Results from nearly 3000 encounters revealed significant variance in visible masks, low compliance of mask-wearing in encounters less than 1.8 m, significant influence of both COVID-19 cases and vaccination rates on mask wearing at half the sites, and no impact of state-level mask mandates when controlling for cases and vaccinations. Integrating public health data can inform predictions of compliant behaviors, or lack thereof, and needs exist to advance a safety culture.

Indexed as

HealthLeisure time physical activityMasksPandemicPolicyProtective behaviorRecreationSafety

Identifiers

PMID37521267
PMCPMC8885300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.