Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521262›Full record

ArticleJournal of outdoor recreation and tourism2023

COVID-19 compliance among urban trail users: Behavioral insights and environmental implications.

Ingrid E Schneider, Megha Budruk, Kim Shinew, Christopher J Wynveen, Taylor Stein, Deonne VanderWoude, William W Hendricks, Heather Gibson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of outdoor recreation and tourism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Predicting physical distancing on recreational trails during COVID-19.Journal of outdoor recreation and tourism · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid E SchneiderUniversity of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources, 1530 Cleveland Avenue North, St Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Megha BudrukArizona State University, School of Community Resources and Development, Tempe, 411 North Central Avenue, Suite 550, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Kim ShinewUniversity of Illinois, Department of Recreation, Sport and Tourism, 110 Huff Hall, 1205 South 4th Street, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.
Christopher J WynveenBaylor University, Health, Human Performance and Recreation, One Bear Place #97311, Waco, TX, 76798-7311, USA.
Taylor SteinUniversity of Florida, School of Forest Resources, 353 Newins-Ziegler Hall, PO Box 110410, Gainsville, FL, 32611-0410, USA.
Deonne VanderWoudeCity of Boulder, Open Space and Mountain Parks, 2550 44th Street, Boolder, CO, 80301, USA.
William W HendricksCalifornia Polytechnic State University, Experience Industry Management, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA.
Heather GibsonUniversity of Florida, Department of Tourism, Hospitality & Event Management, PO Box 118209, Gainsville, FL, 32611, USA.
University of Florida · USArizona State University · USBaylor University · USCalifornia Polytechnic State University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public green spaces provide physical and mental respite, which have become essential and elevated services during the COVID-19 pandemic. As visitation to public parks and recreation areas increased during the pandemic, the challenge of maintaining visitor safety and protecting environmental resources was exacerbated. A key visitor safety practice during the COVID-19 onset was maintaining a physical distance of six feet (1.8 m) between groups. A novel data set documented and compared physical distancing compliance and off-trail behavior on multiple-use trails across multiple states and within select U.S. communities, attending to the impact of select environmental factors. Nearly 6000 observations revealed physical distancing compliance varied and the environmental factors of trail width, density, and signage influenced its variability. Similarly, off-trail movement was related to trail width and density. Clearly the environment matters as people negotiate the 'new normal' of physical distancing during physical activity and outdoor recreation participation. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and likelihood of future health crises, this project provides important information and insight for trail and other public green space management, monitoring, and modelling moving forward. Management implications: As both trail width and visitor density impacted physical distancing, a combination of trail design that accommodates distancing requirements and density management practices that provide sufficient trail user spacing is essential to retain safe and active trail use.Off-trail movement was influenced by both trail width and density, so ensuring safe off-trail spaces exist and using durable off-trail materials can minimize disturbance and protect visitors.Signage is inconsistently significant to influence trail-compliant distancing behavior, but optimizing its placement and content may improve effectiveness.Compliant trail behavior varied by trail width, visitor density, and trail location; therefore, site-specific information is necessary to understand possible visitor behavior and design/implement mitigation strategies.

Indexed as

Off-trail behaviorPhysical densityPhysical distancingSignageTrail width

Identifiers

PMID37521262
PMCPMC9764864
OpenAlexW3169430393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.