Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521255›Full record

ArticleJournal of outdoor recreation and tourism2023

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on SCUBA diving experience in marine protected areas.

Marina Marconi, Vinicius J Giglio, Guilherme H Pereira-Filho, Fabio S Motta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of outdoor recreation and tourism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marina MarconiMarine Ecology and Conservation Lab. (LABECMar), Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Dr. Carvalho de Mendonça, 144, 11070-100, Santos, Brazil.
Vinicius J GiglioMarine Ecology and Conservation Lab. (LABECMar), Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Dr. Carvalho de Mendonça, 144, 11070-100, Santos, Brazil.
Guilherme H Pereira-FilhoMarine Ecology and Conservation Lab. (LABECMar), Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Dr. Carvalho de Mendonça, 144, 11070-100, Santos, Brazil.
Fabio S MottaMarine Ecology and Conservation Lab. (LABECMar), Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Dr. Carvalho de Mendonça, 144, 11070-100, Santos, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faced with the need for isolation of most people to reduce the transmission of COVID-19, a great concern for the well-being of the population has resurfaced. Considering the numerous benefits of outdoor activities to human health and well-being, we assessed whether the quality of the experience of recreational divers in a marine protected area (MPA) was impacted during the pandemic. We applied a semi-structured questionnaire to divers, collected their socioeconomic profile, preferences, motivations, experiences, and compared the results with those obtained in the previous season. We found that the quality of the recreational diver's experience remained high even during one of the world's biggest health crises. This suggests that the combination of contact with a preserved environment and the adaptation of regulations in favor of visitor safety was enough to stimulate positive experiences. Therefore, we highlight the importance of investing in adaptive management so that MPAs continue to promote ecosystem services such as human health and subjective well-being. Management implications: •Quality of experience for recreational divers remained high and was unaffected after the first major wave of COVID-19 cases.•Through adaptive tourism management, MPAs can promote positive experiences even in challenging contexts.•High impact of environmental attributes on the quality of divers' experience reinforces that threats to ecosystems are social impacts.•Socially unequal access to benefits generated by MPAs may negatively influence population's support for these areas.•Efforts are needed to strengthen the equity of distribution of positive social impacts in MPAs.•Potential to provide positive experiences for users must be seen beyond economic value, but as an investment in the population's subjective well-being.

Indexed as

Cryptic scenariosEcosystem servicesHuman well-beingOutdoor recreational activitiesSatisfactionSocioeconomic profileSustainability

Identifiers

PMID37521255
PMCPMC8890976
OpenAlexW4214807427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.