ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2023
Residual cardiovascular risk, use of standard care treatments, and achievement of treatment goals in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in statin-treated patients: mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and future directions-a scoping review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- [Costs of pharmacological treatment in hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Observational
- Rethinking the Diabetes-Cardiovascular Disease Continuum: Toward Integrated Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Stable Patients After ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Expert Opinion on Targeted Lipid Control for Very-high-risk Indian Patients: Bridging the Gap in Real-world Practice.European cardiology · 2025Review
- Estimating the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in U.S. Veterans Using the SMART Risk Score.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- New Modifiable Risk Factors Influencing Coronary Artery Disease Severity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Model in Asians: Current Status and Future Direction.JACC. Asia · 2024Article
- Novel and Emerging LDL-C Lowering Strategies: A New Era of Dyslipidemia Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Risk estimation for recurrent cardiovascular events using the SMART-REACH model and direct inpatient cost profiling in Indonesian ASCVD patients: a large-scale multicenter study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Management of Residual Risk in Chronic Coronary Syndromes. Clinical Pathways for a Quality-Based Secondary Prevention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Residual risk management in patients with previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a relevant issue. Objectives: 1) to assess the residual risk of patients with CVD using the new scores developed to predict recurrent CVD events (SMART score/SMART-REACH model); 2) to determine the use of therapies with cardiovascular benefit and the achievement of therapeutic goals in patients with very high residual risk. Methods: A multicenter, descriptive, cross-sectional study was performed. Individuals over 18 years of age with CVD were included consecutively. The 10-year risk of recurrent events was estimated using the SMART score and the SMART-REACH model. A value ≥ 30% was considered "very high risk". Results: In total, 296 patients (mean age 68.2 ± 9.4 years, 75.7% men) were included. Globally, 32.43% and 64.53% of the population was classified as very high risk by the SMART score and the SMART-REACH model, respectively. Among patients classified as very high risk by the SMART score, 45.7% and 33.3% were treated with high-intensity statins and reached the goal of LDL-C <55 mg/dL, respectively. The results were similar when evaluating very high patients according to the SMART-REACH model (high-intensity statins: 59.7%; LDL-C <55 mg/dL: 43.9%). Few very high-risk patients with diabetes were receiving glucose-lowering drugs with demonstrated cardiovascular benefit. Conclusion: In this secondary prevention population, the residual risk was considerable. Underutilization of standard care treatments and failure to achieve therapeutic goals were evident even in subjects with very high residual risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.