Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521158›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental challenges (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Microplastics with adsorbed contaminants: Mechanisms and Treatment.

Sung Hee Joo, Yejin Liang, Minbeom Kim, Jaehyun Byun, Heechul Choi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental challenges (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 324 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sung Hee JooSchool of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-ro, Oryong-dong, Republic of Korea.
Yejin LiangSchool of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-ro, Oryong-dong, Republic of Korea.
Minbeom KimSchool of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-ro, Oryong-dong, Republic of Korea.
Jaehyun ByunSchool of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-ro, Oryong-dong, Republic of Korea.
Heechul ChoiSchool of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-ro, Oryong-dong, Republic of Korea.
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic pollution has been a significant and widespread global issue, and the recent COVID-19 pandemic has been attributed to its worsening effect as plastics have been contaminated with the deadly infectious virus. Microplastics (MPs) may have played a role as a vector that carries hazardous microbes such as emerging bacterial threats (i.e. antibiotic resistant bacteria) and deadly viruses (e.g., coronavirus); this causes great concern over microplastics contaminated with emerging contaminants. Mitigation and treatment of MPs are challenging because of a range of factors including but not limited to physicochemical properties and composition of MPs and pH and salinity of the solution. Despite the heterogeneous nature of aquatic systems, research has overlooked interactions between contaminants and MPs under environmental conditions, degradation pathways of MPs with adsorbed contaminants, and, especially, the role of adsorbed contaminants in the efficiency of MP treatment through membrane filtration, in comparison with other treatment methods. This review aims to (1) analyze an assortment of factors that could influence the removal of MPs and mechanisms of contaminant adsorption on MPs, (2) identify mechanisms influencing membrane filtration of MPs, (3) examine the fate and transport of MPs with adsorbed contaminants, (4) evaluate membrane filtration of contaminant-adsorbing MPs in comparison to other treatment methods, and (5) draw conclusions and the future outlook based on a literature analysis.

Indexed as

Adsorption mechanismsContaminantsDDT, dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethaneDM, dynamic membraneEDCs, endocrine-disrupting compoundsFOSA or PFOSA, perfluorooctane sulfonamideGAC, granular activated carbonHDPE, high-density polyethyleneLDPE, low-density PEMBR, membrane bioreactorMembrane filtrationMF, microfiltrationMicroplasticsMPs, microplasticsNF, nanofiltrationNOM, natural organic matterNPs, nanoplasticsOM, organic matterPAHs, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsPA, polyamide (nylon)PAs, polyacrylatesPBDEs, polybrominated diphenyl ethersPCBs, polychlorinated biphenylsPE, polyethylenePET, polyethylene terephthalatePFAS, per-/poly-fluoroalkyl substancesPFCAs, perfluorinated carboxylatesPFCs, perfluorinated compoundsPFHxA, perfluorohexanoic acidPFOA, perfluorooctanoic acidPFOS, perfluorooctanesulfonic acidPOPs, persistent organic pollutantsPPCPs, pharmaceuticals and personal care productsPP, polypropylenePS, polystyrenePVC, polyvinyl chloridePVDF, polyvinylidene fluorideRO, reverse osmosisSR, synthetic rubberTMP, trans membrane pressureUF, ultrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID37521158
PMCPMC9767417
OpenAlexW3128091013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.