ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2023
Impact of student-run clinic participation on empathy and interprofessional skills development in medical and pharmacy students.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Students participating in student-run clinics (SRCs) have opportunities to develop and practice beneficial skill sets, including empathy and interprofessional collaboration. Objectives: This study aimed to assess whether participation in an underserved SRC impacts the development of empathy and interprofessional skills in pharmacy and medical students. Methods: This study assessed empathy and interprofessional skills development through a self-assessment survey. The survey included the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to assess empathy, the Attitudes Towards Health Care Teams/Team Skills Scale (ATHCTS/TSS) to assess interprofessional team dynamics, and a free-text response section. Participants were grouped based on whether they participated in the SRC (intervention group) or did not participate in the SRC (control group). A subgroup analysis was performed based on the participants' discipline (medicine vs. pharmacy). To compare differences in IRI, ATHCTS, and TSS scores between study groups, independent samples Results: There were no statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups in IRI, ATHCTS, or TSS scores. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in scores of student pharmacists or medical students. For both disciplines, the thematic analysis revealed the most common positive themes identified were "real-world patient interaction and care," "impact on practice/career development." Alternatively, it revealed the highest reported negative themes identified as "time management and operational difficulties" and "concerns about the quality of/access to care". Conclusions: This study demonstrates that involvement in an SRC neither improves nor hinders a learner's development of empathy and interprofessional team skills. Qualitatively, students reported that participation in an SRC benefited their learning and helped develop their skills, like empathy and team dynamics, in an interprofessional setting. Future research with longitudinal monitoring or alternative assessment tools is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.