Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521007›Full record

ArticleHuman gene (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023

Comparison between the accuracy of chest computerized tomography vs. reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in a tertiary care center in Lebanon; along with their correlation to mortality, morbidity and symptoms in COVID-19 patients.

Noor Hanania, Elie Najem, Hani Tamim, Nada Assaf, Ghaidaa Majari, Wael Younes, Fatmeh Abbas, Ghina Berjawi, Rami Mahfouz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human gene (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Noor HananiaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Elie NajemDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hani TamimDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nada AssafDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ghaidaa MajariDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Wael YounesDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fatmeh AbbasDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ghina BerjawiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Rami MahfouzDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LBAlfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Chest Computerized Tomography has been widely used in COVID patients' assessment. Hence the question arises as to whether there is any correlation between the Ct value and findings on Chest CT scan or clinical presentation of the patient. We wanted to test the hypothesis of whether low Ct values (≤30) in RT-PCR were associated with a high mortality rate, CT scan findings, or with comorbidities such as immunosuppression and lung disease. Methods: The radiographic records and RT-PCR Ct values of 371 COVID patents diagnosed at the American University of Beirut Medical Center were reviewed. Results: We found out that the sensitivity of chest CT scan compared to RT-PCR, the gold standard, turned out to be 74% (95% CI 69-79%). Specificity, on the other hand was 33% (95% CI 16-55%). The positive predictive value of CT was 94% (95% CI 91-97%) and the negative predictive value was 8% (95% CI 4-16%). low Ct values in RT-PCR were not associated with a higher mortality rate ( Conclusion: As long as this pandemic exists, nucleic acid testing was and remains the gold standard of COVID-19 diagnosis worldwide and in our community as it has a superior diagnostic accuracy to CT scan and higher sensitivity (94% vs 74%).

Indexed as

AUBMC, American University of Beirut Medical CenterCAD, Coronary Artery DiseaseCOPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseCOVIDCOVID, Coronavirus DiseaseCT, Computed TomographyCt, Cycle thresholdCT scanCt valueED, Emergency DepartmentkVp, KiloVolt powermAs, MilliamperesMm, MillimetersPCR, Polymerase Chain ReactionrRT-PCR, Real-time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRT-PCRRT-PCR, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivityWHO, World Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID37521007
PMCPMC9891785
OpenAlexW4318757296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.