Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520926›Full record

ArticleCase studies in chemical and environmental engineering2022

Wind of change: Better air for microbial environmental control.

G Messina, D Amodeo, F Taddeini, I De Palma, A Puccio, G Cevenini

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case studies in chemical and environmental engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G MessinaPost Graduate School of Public Health, University of Siena, Italy.
D AmodeoDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Italy.
F TaddeiniPost Graduate School of Public Health, University of Siena, Italy.
I De PalmaDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Italy.
A PuccioDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Bioengineering Lab, University of Siena, Italy.
G CeveniniDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Bioengineering Lab, University of Siena, Italy.
University of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID19 epidemic highlighted the importance of air in the transmission of pathogens. Air disinfection is one of the key points to reduce the risk of transmission both in the health sector and in public, civil and industrial environments. All bacteria and viruses tested to date can be inactivated by UV-C rays. Laboratory tested UV-C systems are increasingly popular and proposed as effective technologies for air purification; few studies have evaluated their performance in populated indoor environments. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of a UV-C disinfection system for air in a real working context. Methods: This experimental study was conducted between December 2020 and February 2021 in an office of the Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine of the University of Siena, Italy. A pre-final version air purifier (Cleaning Air T12), capable of treating 210 m Results: Preliminary tests showed a significant 62.5% reduction in Colony-Forming Units (CFUs) with 36 °C incubation. Reductions in the particulate component were also observed. In the main test, comparison of CFU data, between the device-on phase (90 min) and the subsequent device-off phase (60 min), showed statistically significant increase (p = 0.001) of environmental contamination passing from a mean of 86.6 (65.8-107.4) to 171.1 (143.9-198.3) CFU/m Conclusions: The system, which mainly uses UV-C lamps for disinfection, was able to significantly reduce environmental and human contamination in real time. Experimental tests have shown that as soon as the device is switched off, after at least half an hour of operation, the healthiness of the air decreases drastically within 10 minutes, bringing the airborne microbial contamination (induced by the presence of operators in the environment) to levels even higher than 150% of the last value with the device on. Re-engineering strategies for system improvement were also discussed.

Indexed as

Airborne diseaseAir disinfectionMicrobial contaminationUV-C radiation

Identifiers

PMID37520926
PMCPMC9339158
OpenAlexW4288969684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.