ArticleCaspian journal of internal medicine2023
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of emotions and attitudes towards MRI" (MRI-EMA).
Article in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) should have magnetic resonance imaging evaluation regularly. They will experience anxiety before this examination. We conducted this study to evaluate the validity and reliability of emotions and attitudes towards MRI" (MRI-EMA). Methods: One hundred-nine patients with MS were asked to fill the valid and reliable Persian version of Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and MRI-EMA, questionnaires. Two weeks later, twenty cases were asked to fill the questionnaire again to assess reliability. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha analysis were used. The correlation coefficient between BAI and MRI-EMA was calculated. Five neurologists assessed content validity by content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI). Results: The mean age was 37.2±1.2 years and 77% were females. CVI and CVR for all questions were 100%. The correlation coefficient between BAI and MRI-EMA was r=0.1, P=0.1 and only fear of MRI subscale was significantly correlated with BAI. The ICC of all questions was between 0.79 and 0.98. Conclusion: Patients with MS have to be routinely screened with MRI which provides anxiety for them. Considering MRI related anxiety is crucial for these cases. The Persian version of the MRI-EMA questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring MRI related anxiety in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.