Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520853›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur bildungsforschung2022

[What role does social background and school type play in perceptions of digital feedback and academic self-concept during the COVID-19 pandemic?]

Fabian Alexander Emde, Kira Elena Weber

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur bildungsforschung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fabian Alexander EmdeInstitut für Bildungswissenschaft, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0002-8100-1843
Kira Elena WeberLeibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik, Olshausenstraße 62, 24118 Kiel, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0002-6564-9578

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How students perceive feedback shapes the impact of feedback on academic achievement and the development of academic self-concepts. The COVID-19 pandemic changed the framework of school learning and thus the opportunities for feedback in the classroom. In the present study, a sample of 668 students from different types of schools was used to investigate how often they received digital feedback from teachers and how they perceived the feedback. We analysed the role of school type and social background (socioeconomic status and migration background) in the perception of feedback and whether social background, school type, and perceived feedback can predict academic self-concept. In terms of school type, students in the higher academic track (Gymnasium) perceived their teachers' feedback as less fair, accepted it less, and saw less benefit in the feedback. The social background of students with and without a migration background did not play a significant role in their perception of the feedback. The results of a multiple regression model showed that socioeconomic status, perceived fairness, and usefulness of the feedback were positive predictors of academic self-concept in distance education. Thus, the present study provides preliminary evidence on the perception of digital feedback and its relationship to academic self-concept. The results imply that teachers should more strongly incorporate students' perceptions of feedback to especially enhance academic self-concept.

Indexed as

Academic self-conceptCOVID-19Distance educationDistance learningFeedbackSocial inequalityStudents

Identifiers

PMID37520853
PMCPMC9069120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.