ArticleFrontiers in physiology2023
Deep learning for the rapid automatic segmentation of forearm muscle boundaries from ultrasound datasets.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between nutritional targets and muscle index changes in patients with terminal cancer under palliative care.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Advances in Ultrasound-Guided Surgery and Artificial Intelligence Applications in Musculoskeletal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Convolutional Neural Network Approaches in Median Nerve Morphological Assessment from Ultrasound Images.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) is widely used in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. However, the low efficiency and non-uniformity of artificial recognition hinder the application and popularization of US for this purpose. Herein, we developed an automatic muscle boundary segmentation tool for US image recognition and tested its accuracy and clinical applicability. Our dataset was constructed from a total of 465 US images of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) from 19 participants (10 men and 9 women, age 27.4 ± 6.3 years). We used the U-net model for US image segmentation. The U-net output often includes several disconnected regions. Anatomically, the target muscle usually only has one connected region. Based on this principle, we designed an algorithm written in C++ to eliminate redundantly connected regions of outputs. The muscle boundary images generated by the tool were compared with those obtained by professionals and junior physicians to analyze their accuracy and clinical applicability. The dataset was divided into five groups for experimentation, and the average Dice coefficient, recall, and accuracy, as well as the intersection over union (IoU) of the prediction set in each group were all about 90%. Furthermore, we propose a new standard to judge the segmentation results. Under this standard, 99% of the total 150 predicted images by U-net are excellent, which is very close to the segmentation result obtained by professional doctors. In this study, we developed an automatic muscle segmentation tool for US-guided muscle injections. The accuracy of the recognition of the muscle boundary was similar to that of manual labeling by a specialist sonographer, providing a reliable auxiliary tool for clinicians to shorten the US learning cycle, reduce the clinical workload, and improve injection safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.