Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520710›Full record

ArticleiScience2023

Humans perceive warmth and competence in artificial intelligence.

Kevin R McKee, Xuechunzi Bai, Susan T Fiske

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Beyond the Machine: An Integrative Framework of Anthropomorphism in AI.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Social Preferences Toward Humans and Machines: A Systematic Experiment on the Role of Machine Payoffs.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin R McKeeDeepMind, N1C 4DN London, UK.
Xuechunzi BaiDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Susan T FiskeDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Princeton University · USGoogle DeepMind (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (A.I.) increasingly suffuses everyday life. However, people are frequently reluctant to interact with A.I. systems. This challenges both the deployment of beneficial A.I. technology and the development of deep learning systems that depend on humans for oversight, direction, and regulation. Nine studies (

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceHuman-computer interactionPsychology

Identifiers

PMID37520710
PMCPMC10371826
OpenAlexW4383065511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.