ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023
Synthetic computed tomography based dose calculation in prostate cancer patients with hip prostheses for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metal artifact reduction for 3 T MRI-only prostate radiotherapy in patients with hip prostheses: impact on target definition, synthetic CT generation, dose calculation, and fiducial marker identification.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Magnetic Resonance Guided Radical Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in the Presence of Bilateral Hip Prostheses: First Experience With a 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Linear Accelerator.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Synthetic Computed Tomography generation using deep-learning for female pelvic radiotherapy planning.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Metallic hip prostheses cause substantial artefacts in both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images used in radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) for prostate cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dose calculation accuracy of a synthetic CT (sCT) generation workflow and the improvement in implant visibility using metal artefact reduction sequences. Materials and methods: The study included 23 patients with prostate cancer who had hip prostheses, of which 10 patients had bilateral hip implants. An in-house protocol was applied to create sCT images for dose calculation comparison. The study compared prostheses volumes and resulting avoidance sectors against planning target volume (PTV) dose uniformity and organs at risk (OAR) sparing. Results: Median PTV dose difference between sCT and CT-based dose calculation among all patients was 0.1 % (-0.4 to 0.4%) (median(range)). Bladder and rectum differences (V Conclusions: An in-house protocol for generating sCT images for dose calculation provided clinically feasible dose calculation accuracy for prostate cancer patients with hip implants. PTV median dose difference for uni- and bilateral patients with avoidance sectors remained <0.4%. The Outphase images enhanced implant visibility resulting in smaller avoidance sectors, better OAR sparing, and improved PTV uniformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.