ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2023
A survey on awareness and knowledge among dentist practicing regenerative endodontics towards current regenerative endodontic protocols and the scaffolds used in regenerative dentistry.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the knowledge gap in dental stem cell therapy: educational challenges and adoption attitudes among Palestinian dentists.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinician Decision-Making for the Endodontic Treatment of Immature Permanent Teeth: A National Survey of Pediatric Dentists and Endodontists.International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are many inconsistencies in the protocols followed for Regenerative Endodontic Procedures (REP's).This study was formulated with an aim to conduct a survey among Pediatric Dentists, Endodontists and General Practioners treating Necrotic young permanent teeth to examine their awareness and Knowledge on Current Regenerative Endodontic Protocols and Scaffolds used in regenerative dentistry. Methods: A Cross-Sectional Survey was carried out amongst 100 Pediatric dentists,100 Endodontists and 100 General Practioners. It was web-based survey and the questionnaire was formulated and all the items in the questionnaire were tested for reliability and validity before circulation of the questionnaire for the purpose of the study. Results: The results of the study indicated that all the three groups were unaware that failure of cases should be reported to AEE (American Academy of Endodontics) REP Database and only 20.2, 20.1 and 0.3 % of Pediatric dentists,Endodontists and General Dentists preferred Regenerative Dentistry as a clinical protocol for REP. With respect to knowledge regarding irrigation and disinfection procedures all three groups were lacking in the knowledge regarding intracanal medicament for disinfection and the irrigation solutions. Conclusion: There is a lack of homogeneity in protocols followed for REP among those practicing Regenerative Endodontics as a protocol. Since it's an evolving science there is a need to bring about a uniformity in practices to increase the evidences to support the causal effect relation of regenerative endodontics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.