Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520597›Full record

ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2023

Middle mesial canal in mandibular first molar: A narrative review.

Raghavendra Penukonda, Harshada Pattar, Phrabhakaran Nambiar, Afaf Al-Haddad

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raghavendra PenukondaDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Bandar Saujana Putra, 42610, Selangor, Malaysia.
Harshada PattarDepartment of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Bandar Saujana Putra, 42610, Selangor, Malaysia.
Phrabhakaran NambiarHead of the Department, Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Bandar Saujana Putra, 42610, Selangor, Malaysia.
Afaf Al-HaddadDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Bandar Saujana Putra, 42610, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mahsa University · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This review aimed to assess the incidence, anatomical characteristics, identification, and clinical management using conventional techniques and advanced tools to manage MMCs successfully. Methods: Medline/PubMed and Scopus databases were searched using "Middle mesial canal," "Middle mesial root canal," OR "Accessory mesial canal" keywords from 1 January 1970 and 1 February 2023. The most pertinent articles were chosen for the review from the retrieved articles. In addition, relevant articles were added by manually searching the list of references. Results: The incidence of MMC is noticeable in younger people, and the confluent canal is the most common type. The majority of MMCs merged with mesiobuccal (MB) canals rather than mesiolingual (ML) canals. Clinical management could be employed using the standard endodontics protocol, and recent radiography technologies, magnification, rotary, and obturation materials can facilitate the procedures. Conclusion: The possibility of the incidence of MMC is not unusual. Detection and thorough debridement followed by obturation of the canal could increase the success rate of clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Canal configurationCone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)Dental Operating Microscope (DOM)Mandibular first molar (M1M)Middle mesial canal (MMC)

Identifiers

PMID37520597
PMCPMC10373078
OpenAlexW4377086791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.