Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520513›Full record

ReviewDiscover health systems2023

Optimisation of perioperative procedural factors to reduce the risk of surgical site infection in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review.

P Calò, F Catena, D Corsaro, L Costantini, F Falez, B Moretti, V Parrinello, E Romanini, A Spinarelli, G Vaccaro and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover health systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

P CalòUniversity Teaching Hospital of Cagliari and Surgical Department at University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
F CatenaDepartment General and Emergency Surgery at Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
D CorsaroInternational Research at BHAVE, Via GiambattistaVico 1, 00196 Rome, Italy.
L CostantiniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, School of Community Medicine and Primary Care, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
F FalezDepartment of Orthopaedics ASL Roma 1 and Director UOC Orthopaedics Hospital San Filippo Neri, Rome, Italy.
B MorettiOrthopedics and Traumatology Complex Operative Unit, University Teaching Hospital of Bari Polyclinic, Bari, Italy.
V ParrinelloOperative Unit of Quality and Clinical Risk Manager at "G.Rodolico-San Marco" University Teaching Hospital in Catania, Catania, Italy.
E RomaniniSIOT Guidelines Commission, Rome, Italy.
A SpinarelliOperative Unit of Orthopedics and Traumatology at University Teaching Hospital of Bari Polyclinic, Bari, Italy.
G VaccaroSocial, Epidemiological and Outcome Research at BHAVE, Via Giambattista Vico 1, 00196 Rome, Italy.
F VenneriSimple Structure Clinical Risk and Surgical Emergency in Florence, Florence, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITCenter for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITOspedale San Filippo Neri · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSI) are the leading cause of hospital readmission after surgical procedures with significant impact on post-operative morbidity and mortality. Modifiable risk factors for SSI include procedural aspects, which include the possibility of instrument contamination, the duration of the operation, the number of people present and the traffic in the room and the ventilation system of the operating theatre.The aim of this systematic review was to provide literature evidence on the relationship between features of surgical procedure sets and the frequency of SSI in patients undergoing surgical treatment, and to analyse how time frames of perioperative processes and operating theatre traffic vary in relation to the features of the procedure sets use, in order tooptimise infection control in OT. The results of the systematic review brought to light observational studies that can be divided into two categories: evidence of purely clinical significance and evidence of mainly organisational, managerial and financial significance. These two systems are largely interconnected, and reciprocally influence each other. The decision to use disposable devices and instruments has been accompanied by a lower incidence in surgical site infections and surgical revisions for remediation. A concomitant reduction in post-operative functional recovery time has also been observed. Also, the rationalisation of traditional surgical sets has also been observed in conjunction with outcomes of clinical significance.

Identifiers

PMID37520513
PMCPMC9924866
OpenAlexW4320484407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.