Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520485›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicine and life2023

Effect of inter-dental abutment distance on the impression accuracy of digital and conventional methods.

Shouka Shalileh, Kamyar Abbasi, Hamed Azhmand, Seyed Ahmad Ghoraishian, Mina Mohaghegh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A cross-sectional study on improving clinical efficiency through centralized digital impression.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shouka ShalilehDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Kamyar AbbasiDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed AzhmandDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Ahmad GhoraishianDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mina MohagheghDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effect of inter-dental abutment distance on the accuracy of digital and conventional impression methods. Five maxillary and mandibular models were prepared with different inter-dental abutment distances. Digital scans were obtained using an extraoral laboratory scanner as reference data. Each group was scanned 8 times using the intra-oral scanner for the digital method. For the conventional impression method, 8 additional silicone impression material was used to generate the stone casts from each group. Then casts were scanned. In the next step, stereolithography (STL) data was exported from the scans. The STL files were super-imposed on the reference scans using 3shape dental designer software to make the measurement. Kolmogorov-Smirnoff was used to determine if the data were normally distributed. In the digital impression method, as the abutment distance increased, the accuracy decreased. Various inter-dental abutment distances in digital groups showed significant differences (p=0.016) in impression accuracy, while the difference among conventional groups was not statistically significant (p=0.822). In the digital method, the mean inter-dental abutment between the 4-5 and 3-7 groups, 4-6 and 3-7 groups had a significant difference (p<0.05). However, the conventional method revealed no significant differences (p>0.05) between groups. In conclusion, when the inter-dental abutment distance exists and is surrounded by soft tissue, the possibility of error in the digital impression method is higher than in the conventional impression method.

Indexed as

Dental AbutmentsModels, DentalComputer-Aided DesignDental Impression TechniqueHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMandibleMaxillaaccuracyconventional impressiondental abutmentdigital impressionimpressionintraoral scanner

Identifiers

PMID37520485
PMCPMC10375351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.