ArticleJournal of electrical engineering & technology2022
An Alternative Athlete Monitoring System Using Cost-Effective Inertial Sensing Instrumentation.
Article in Journal of electrical engineering & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An examination of the human gait is feasible using inertial sensing. The embedded accelerometer and gyroscope in an inertial measurement unit can evaluate physical activity-based sports and this unit is relatively affordable compared to global positioning systems or video recording quantification. This study developed a cost-effective sports monitoring investigation method with an inertial sensor attached to the right leg of the athletes. In total, four parameters were simultaneously tracked to assess the entire sensor performance in real-time. The accelerometer measured the typical leg angle when walking and running, whereas the gyroscope processed the raw data to obtain the stride frequency from the time-domain data. Moreover, a comparison between the accelerometer and gyroscope was presented while simultaneously attaining the signal to convert the time-domain data to frequency results. Also, the number of strides and linear velocity was expressed as results in this study. To confirm the results, a statistical hypothesis test was implemented for all obtained results. The results indicated that the inertial sensing instrumentation used in this study is promising and could be an affordable alternative option for a sports monitoring system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.