Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520365›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Biological soil crusts on agricultural soils of mesic regions promote microbial cross-kingdom co-occurrences and nutrient retention.

Julia Katharina Kurth, Martin Albrecht, Karin Glaser, Ulf Karsten, Gisle Vestergaard, Martin Armbruster, Susanne Kublik, Christoph A O Schmid, Michael Schloter, Stefanie Schulz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia Katharina KurthChair for Environmental Microbiology, TUM School of Life Science, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany.
Martin AlbrechtDepartment of Applied Ecology and Phycology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Karin GlaserDepartment of Applied Ecology and Phycology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Ulf KarstenDepartment of Applied Ecology and Phycology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Gisle VestergaardSection of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin ArmbrusterAgricultural Analytical and Research Institute Speyer (LUFA Speyer), Speyer, Germany.
Susanne KublikEnvironmental Health Centre, Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München - Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Neuherberg, Germany.
Christoph A O SchmidEnvironmental Health Centre, Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München - Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Neuherberg, Germany.
Michael SchloterChair for Environmental Microbiology, TUM School of Life Science, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany.
Stefanie SchulzEnvironmental Health Centre, Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München - Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Neuherberg, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEUniversity of Rostock · DELandwirtschaftliche Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalt Speyer · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are known as biological hotspots on undisturbed, nutrient-poor bare soil surfaces and until now, are mostly observed in (semi-) arid regions but are currently poorly understood in agricultural systems. This is a crucial knowledge gap because managed sites of mesic regions can quickly cover large areas. Thus, we addressed the questions (i) if biocrusts from agricultural sites of mesic regions also increase nutrients and microbial biomass as their (semi-) arid counterparts, and (ii) how microbial community assemblage in those biocrusts is influenced by disturbances like different fertilization and tillage regimes. Methods: We compared phototrophic biomass, nutrient concentrations as well as the abundance, diversity and co-occurrence of Archaea, Bacteria, and Fungi in biocrusts and bare soils at a site with low agricultural soil quality. Results and Discussion: Biocrusts built up significant quantities of phototrophic and microbial biomass and stored more nutrients compared to bare soils independent of the fertilizer applied and the tillage management. Surprisingly, particularly low abundant Actinobacteria were highly connected in the networks of biocrusts. In contrast, Cyanobacteria were rarely connected, which indicates reduced importance within the microbial community of the biocrusts. However, in bare soil networks, Cyanobacteria were the most connected bacterial group and, hence, might play a role in early biocrust formation due to their ability to, e.g., fix nitrogen and thus induce hotspot-like properties. The microbial community composition differed and network complexity was reduced by conventional tillage. Mineral and organic fertilizers led to networks that are more complex with a higher percentage of positive correlations favoring microbe-microbe interactions. Our study demonstrates that biocrusts represent a microbial hotspot on soil surfaces under agricultural use, which may have important implications for sustainable management of such soils in the future.

Indexed as

ampliconbiocrustCyanobacteriahotspotmanaged sitemesophilic regionmicrobial co-occurrence network

Identifiers

PMID37520365
PMCPMC10382179
OpenAlexW4384407221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.