Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520280›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Reverse engineering DNA origami nanostructure designs from raw scaffold and staple sequence lists.

Ben Shirt-Ediss, Jordan Connolly, Juan Elezgaray, Emanuela Torelli, Silvia Adriana Navarro, Jaume Bacardit, Natalio Krasnogor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ben Shirt-EdissInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex Biosystems Research Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5TG, UK.
Jordan ConnollyInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex Biosystems Research Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5TG, UK.
Juan ElezgarayCentre de Recherche Paul Pascal, CNRS, UMR503, Pessac 33600, France.
Emanuela TorelliInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex Biosystems Research Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5TG, UK.
Silvia Adriana NavarroInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex Biosystems Research Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5TG, UK.
Jaume BacarditInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex Biosystems Research Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5TG, UK.
Natalio KrasnogorInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex Biosystems Research Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5TG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designs for scaffolded DNA origami nanostructures are commonly and minimally published as the list of DNA staple and scaffold sequences required. In nearly all cases, high-level editable design files (e.g. caDNAno) which generated the low-level sequences are not made available. This de facto 'raw sequence' exchange format allows published origami designs to be re-attempted in the laboratory by other groups, but effectively stops designs from being significantly modified or re-purposed for new future applications. To make the raw sequence exchange format more accessible to further design and engineering, in this work we propose the first algorithmic solution to the inverse problem of converting staple/scaffold sequences back to a 'guide schematic' resembling the original origami schematic. The guide schematic can be used to aid the manual re-input of an origami into a CAD tool like caDNAno, hence recovering a high-level editable design file. Creation of a guide schematic can also be used to double check that a list of staple strand sequences does not have errors and indeed does assemble into a desired origami nanostructure prior to costly laboratory experimentation. We tested our reverse algorithm on 36 diverse origami designs from the literature and found that 29 origamis (81 %) had a good quality guide schematic recovered from raw sequences. Our software is made available at https://revnano.readthedocs.io.

Indexed as

Constraint programmingContact mapDNA nanotechnologyDNA origamiReverse engineeringSpring embedder

Identifiers

PMID37520280
PMCPMC10371787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.