Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520257›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Comparison of the elastic recovery and strain-in-compression of commercial and novel vinyl polysiloxane impression materials incorporating a novel crosslinking agent and a surfactant.

Shahab Ud Din, Osama Khattak, Farooq Ahmad Chaudhary, Asfia Saeed, Azhar Iqbal, Jamaluddin Syed, Alaa Ahmed Kensara, Thani Alsharari, Mohammed Mustafa, Sherif Elsayed Sultan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Shahab Ud DinSchool of Dentistry (SOD), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University (SZABMU), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Osama KhattakDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Farooq Ahmad ChaudharySchool of Dentistry (SOD), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University (SZABMU), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Asfia SaeedShifa College of Dentistry, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Azhar IqbalDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Jamaluddin SyedOral Basic Clinical Sciences Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King AbdulAziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Alaa Ahmed KensaraDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, King Abdul Aziz University Dental Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Thani AlsharariDepartment of Restorative and Dental Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed MustafaDepartment of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Sherif Elsayed SultanDepartment of Fixed Prosthodontics, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Mangala PatelCentre for Oral Bioengineering (Dental Physical Sciences Unit), Bart's and The London, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Jouf University · SAShaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology · PKKing Abdulaziz University · SAKing Abdul Aziz University Hospital · SAPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAQueen Mary University of London · GBShifa Tameer-e-Millat University · PKTaif University · SATanta University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to formulate experimental vinylpolysiloxane (VPS) impression materials and compare their elastic recovery and strain-in-compressions with three commercial VPS materials (Aquasil, Elite, and Extrude). Five experimental materials (Exp), two hydrophobic (Exp-I and II) and three hydrophilic (Exp-III, IV and V) were developed. Exp 1 contained vinyl-terminated poly-dimethyl siloxane and a conventional cross-linking agent (poly methylhydrosiloxane), while Exp- II contained a novel cross-linking agent that is tetra-functional dimethyl-silyl-ortho-silicate (TFDMSOS). Exp III-V (hydrophilic materials) were formulated by incorporating different concentrations of non-ionic surfactant (Rhodasurf CET-2) into Exp II formulation. Measurement of elastic recovery and strain-in-compression for commercial and experimental materials were performed according to ISO4823 standard using the calibrated mechanical testing machine (Tinius Olsen). One-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and Tukey's

Indexed as

Pulmonary SurfactantsSiloxanesDental Impression MaterialsLipoproteinsMaterials TestingPolyvinylsSurface-Active AgentsDental Impression MaterialsLipoproteinsPolyvinylsPulmonary SurfactantsSiloxanesSurface-Active Agentsvinyl polysiloxaneElastic recoveryElastomersHydrophilic vinyl polysiloxaneImpression materialsStrain-in-compressions

Identifiers

PMID37520257
PMCPMC10373643
OpenAlexW4385211721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.