Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520049›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2023

The current state and potential innovation of fetal cardiac MRI.

Michelle Udine, Yue-Hin Loke, Suma Goudar, Mary T Donofrio, Uyen Truong, Anita Krishnan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Fetal cardiac masses.Pediatric radiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Third trimester fetal 4D flow MRI with motion correction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle UdineDivision of Cardiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Yue-Hin LokeDivision of Cardiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Suma GoudarDivision of Cardiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Mary T DonofrioDivision of Cardiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Uyen TruongDivision of Cardiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Anita KrishnanDivision of Cardiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Children's National · US

Funding

Development of a Beat to Beat Fetal ElectrocardiogramR21HD097598 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KRISHNAN, ANITA · 2020 to 2021
$491k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD097598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal cardiac MRI is a rapidly evolving form of diagnostic testing with utility as a complementary imaging modality for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease and assessment of the fetal cardiovascular system. Previous technical limitations without cardiac gating for the fetal heart rate has been overcome with recent technology. There is potential utility of fetal electrocardiography for direct cardiac gating. In addition to anatomic assessment, innovative technology has allowed for assessment of blood flow, 3D datasets, and 4D flow, providing important insight into fetal cardiovascular physiology. Despite remaining technical barriers, with increased use of fCMR worldwide, it will become an important clinical tool to improve the prenatal care of fetuses with CHD.

Indexed as

4D flowfetal cardiac MRIfetal echocardiographyfetal MRIfetal ultrasoundprenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease

Identifiers

PMID37520049
PMCPMC10375913
OpenAlexW4384296225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.